HEADLINES

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Chile glad to welcome foreign assistance. Obama on the Gulf Oil Spill… Not so much

The colors of their flag are Red, White and Blue.  And if you were anything like me, you watched today as miner after miner was carefully taken to the surface.  They hugged loved ones.  They shook hands with their President.  And they gave their love to their country.

But though Chile is an advanced society, they didn't get those folks out alone.  They needed help, and they knew the international community would respond to their request for assistance.  For example, the drilling system employed came from a Pennsylvania mining company.  A great deal of the technology to deal with the physical and medical complications of being extracted from such depths came from NASA in the United States.  Additional technology came from Peru, Canada and Australia.

Does this sound familiar, especially with regards to a natural/manmade disaster that occurred recently in the United States?

Does Chile's President sound like a Captain Kickass to you?


President Pinera and the First Lady have been in the Atacama Desert since the evacuation began to personally greet each man as he emerges from the underground chamber.

Florencio Avalos, the first miner to be rescued from the San Jose mine, received a giant bear-hug from Chile's leader.

Speaking after Mr Avalos was freed from the specially made capsule, Mr Pinera said: "The lesson of the miners remains with us forever."

He added that the group had shown "that when Chile unites in the face of adversity, it can achieve great things".

Mr Pinera has become the champion of the miners during this crisis and the right-wing politician has seen his popularity soar.


Mr. Obama could hardly be bothered to even speak about the Macondo well's capping, much less its final death

Course not.

He's been too busy playing golf, talking about Republican slurpees and explaining how there's really no such animal as a "shovel-ready job."








Sent from my iPhone

The Battle for America begins in 20 Days

However, the movie is already out:

In Generation Zero, Citizens United & Director Stephen Bannon laid out the crimes. In Fire from the Heartland they observed the heroes. The third film of this stylized trilogy is the final act and we are all in it.

The Battle for America wasn't specifically written for politicos like you and me. It was developed with the sideliners in mind. The politically uninvolved, if there are any left, to give them the perspective and the emotional stirring they may need to get out and cast votes in favor of liberty this November.

With appearances by Newt Gingrich and Ann Coulter and with the bulk of the narration done by Dick Morris, this film lays out the state of affairs and the feelings that have been brought to the forefront of American culture in the last 20 months. It's gripping and powerful and as is the case with it's counterparts, is an excellent film to show to that friend of yours that's still "not sure".

Battle for America reexamines where we were, where we are, how we got here, and most importantly, where we need to go. It's unapologetic in it's bluntness as it not only reminds us of how important it is to win this November, but briefly imagines the cost of losing.

It examines the Tea Parties and recognizes that movement as the solution; an answer to what ails our nation. In one of my favorite moments from the film, they highlight the difference between Americans and the rest of the world.  If you need an example of American Exceptionalism, look no further than how we protest in order to get our governments to stop trying to take care of us, stop trying to protect us from ourselves, and get out of the way.  This is in stark contrast to European riots where cars are set on fire and violence is commonplace as people demand that the government do everything for them.  American individuality has led this nation to be the most prosperous in history.  Isn't that worth fighting for?

I had the opportunity to interview the Director and discuss the film with him recently. I encourage you to listen to our conversation as we cover not only the substance of the film, but the future of conservative media and the role we must all play to restore our government to it's rightful place: under the people's control. (The interview with Stephen begins about 10 minutes into the show)

Listen to internet radio with Ben Howe on Blog Talk Radio







Sent from my iPhone

Government Spying Through Social Networks?

Wow!… O’Donnell Nails Coons: “I Would Argue That There Are More People Who Would Support My Catholic

She nailed him.
Christine O'Donnell nailed self-professed Marxist Chris Coons tonight saying,

"I would argue that more people would support my Catholic beliefs than his Marxist beliefs."

No wonder the state-run media hates her. She keeps bringing up the facts that they are not wanting to disclose.
Wow!

Coons then lied about his "Bearded Marxist" essay.

The Caucus reported:

A feisty, aggressive Ms. O'Donnell called Mr. Coons a Marxist whose beliefs came from a socialist professor and said he would "rubber stamp" the policies of the Democrats in Washington. Mr. Coons raised questions about whether Ms. O'Donnell's faith would drive her positions on social issues like abortion, prayer and evolution.

Coons wrote an article for his college paper where he admitted that he was a bearded Marxist.








Sent from my iPhone

Krauthammer: “It’s Not Surprising Obama Doesn’t Know What a Shovel Ready Project Is. He’s Never Work

Krauthammer Was Shovel Ready Tonight–

Obama admitted today that there is no such thing as a shovel ready job.
Krauthammer let him have it tonight on Special Report.

Charles Krauthammer:

"Well that is quite an admission. You know, a year and a half and half a trillion dollars later he says these things that I talked about endlessly don't exist. It's not actually surprising that he doesn't know what a shovel ready project is. Having never worked in the private sector he wouldn't be sure what a project is and there isn't a lot of shoveling at Harvard Law School." So I can understand that this was one of the greatest "Oops" in American history. And it's going to be hard for a democrat when you show one tape against another. They're goint to say, "So you supported a trillion dollars offered by a president who didn't even know that this stuff that this stuff is not going to happen?"



http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/10/krauthammer-its-not-surprising-obama-doesnt-know-what-a-shovel-ready-project-is-hes-never-worked-in-the-private-sector-theres-not-a-lot-of-shoveling-at-harvard-law-school-video/





Sent from my iPhone

Foreclosure Fiasco’s Trail Leads to Washington: Jonathan Weil

What were banking regulators doing while some of the biggest U.S. lenders routinely filed false foreclosure documents in local courthouses around the country? In the case of IndyMac Federal Bank, it turns out the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was running the joint.







Sent from my iPhone

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad calls for 9/11 investigation

Mahmoud fuelled his claims that the US government was behind the Sept 11 attack on America and demanded to 'know the truth of what happened' during his visit to Lebanon.







Sent from my iPhone

Democrats Stealing Elections: Illinois Dems Deny Military the Vote in 2010 Election

The Dept. of justice is investigating whether the Democrat Secretary of State for Illinois has somehow forgotten to send thousands of absentee ballots out to members of the military serving overseas and in this close election climate in Illinois, these ballots now not to be counted could be decisive. Federal election law, specifically the Overseas [...]







Sent from my iPhone

Nancy Pelosi's Historical Hypocrisy is Bad For America

 Most people don't need lots of convincing when they hear the phrase, Nancy Pelosi is a hypocrite. After all in the last poll conducted by liberal media outlet CBS News, the speaker of the house received an approval rating of 15%. That same poll reported that 35% of all voters will be making an anti-Pelosi vote in the mid-term elections (to make sure she is not the speaker of the house in the new congress). Apparently voters have figured out that most of the Democrats in Congress walk in step with Ms. Pelosi's marching orders. But here is something they haven't figured out.

If you go back seven years ago when Ms. Pelosi was the  Minority Leader, she made charges against then President Bush that would be more appropriate if made today and directed toward President Obama. 
                                                                                       
Pelosi Said Then: On July 24, 2003, Democrat Leader Pelosi stated, "The unemployment rate is the highest in nine years; middle-class families are finding it harder to succeed; and Republican Members of Congress are preparing to leave for the August recess without providing an expanded child tax credit to the working and military families of 12 million children."
  • Pelosi Ignores Today:  Under the Obama administration the unemployment rate reached a 26-year high of 10.2 percent.  The current unemployment rate is 9.6 percent.  Participation in the federal food stamp program has set records for 20 straight months.  On average, 43.3 million people are expected to receive food stamps each month in the fiscal year that began October 1, 2010.  Yet on September 30, 2010, Speaker Pelosi adjourned the Congress without preventing a recovery-crushing $3.9 trillion tax increase on all Americans—the highest tax increase in history.
Pelosi Said Then: On March 7, 2003, Democrat Leader Pelosi stated, "President Bush's first $1.7 trillion tax cut came with a promise—that it would create jobs and grow the economy.  We all know that it has not.  The rhetoric was good, but the reality couldn't be more different...We need policies that create jobs.  It is that simple…The choice for the American people is clear."
  • Pelosi Ignores Today: In March 2003, the nation's unemployment rate stood at 5.9 percent.  In February 2009, the Obama administration promised that with passage of the Democrats' $1.2 trillion stimulus, unemployment would not rise above eight percent.  Today, the nation's unemployment rate stands at 9.6 percent, and the unemployment rate has been above nine percent for the past 17 months, including a 26 year high of 10.2 percent in October 2009. 
Pelosi Said Then: On May 14, 2003, Democrat Leader Pelosi stated, "Since January 20, 2001, when George W. Bush was sworn in as President, 2.7 million private sector jobs have been lost, the worst record of job creation of any Administration since the Great Depression…America's unemployed workers need jobs."
  • Pelosi Ignores Today: The economy has lost nearly four million jobs on President Obama's watch.  According to Gallup, "Underemployment peaked at 20.4 percent in April and has yet to fall below 18.3 percent this year." 
Pelosi Said Then: On June 6, 2003, Democrat Leader Pelosi stated, "Sadly, the Labor Department announced this morning that the unemployment rate in May increased to 6.1 percent—the highest rate since July 1994.  And that brings the total number of private sector jobs lost since President Bush took office to 3.1 million, the worst record of job creation of any President since the Great Depression."
  • Pelosi Ignores Today: The Associated Press reports that the unemployment rate has been stuck above 9.5 percent for 14 consecutive months, the longest stretch since the 1930s.  There are currently 15 million Americans unemployed. 
Pelosi Said Then: In October 2003, Democrat Leader Nancy Pelosi stated, "Mr. President, where are the jobs?  The American [people] will not settle, nor should the Republicans celebrate a jobless recovery."
  • Pelosi Ignores Today:  In October of 2003, the unemployment rate stood at 6 percent and 203,000 jobs were created.  After four years of Democrat leadership in Congress and 21 months of President Obama's tax-and-spend policies, on October 8, 2010, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that the unemployment rate remained at 9.6 percent.  According to BLS data, 2.25 million jobs have been lost since January 2009.
The fact that Nancy Pelosi blasted George Bush on issues seven years ago but gives Barack Obama a free pass today shows her real concern is not the people of the United States, her only concern is politics. Sadly she runs the Democratic Caucus in the House of Representatives with an iron fist. Voters in the upcoming mid-term elections should keep in mind that every vote for a congressional Democrat is a vote for Nancy Pelosi. While it is true Nancy Pelosi is only on the ballot in one congressional district, she controls the votes of most of the Democrats in the other districts.
Please email me at yidwithlid@aol.com to be put onto my mailing list. Feel free to reproduce any article but please link back to http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com







Sent from my iPhone

Cameraman Claims Video Shows Day Laborers Holding Pro-Boxer Banners - FoxNews.com

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/10/13/cameraman-claims-video-shows-boxer-camp-trying-hire-day-laborers-hold-signs/<br><div style="color:rgb(60%,60%,60%)">Sent with <a

Document Mess Hits Fannie, Freddie

Fannie and Freddie are reviewing the work of a top Florida law firm they recommended to process foreclosures, raising questions for the first time about their role in the unfolding mortgage-foreclosure crisis.







Sent from my iPhone

Matthews to AFL-CIO chief: If those Chilean miners were tea partiers, they’d be dead

"They would have been killing each other after about two days."


Via the 'Busters, this is one of those clips that's so immensely stupid, it's actually confounding. Where to begin? Is he suggesting that tea partiers are so committed to the "every man for himself" ethos of individualism that they oppose on principle any form of mutually beneficial cooperation — especially between desperate miners or, say, [...]

Read this post »








Sent from my iPhone

MILITARY BALLOTS MAY NOT COUNT IN ILLINOIS

http://www.wlsam.com/Article.asp?id=1985148&spid=<br><div style="color:rgb(60%,60%,60%)">Sent with <a

(BN) Fed Considers Raising Inflation Expectations to Boost Economy

Bloomberg News, sent from my iPhone.

Fed Considers Raising Inflation Expectations to Boost Economy

Oct. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve policy makers may want Americans to expect inflation to accelerate in the future so they spend more of their money now.

Central bankers, seeking ways to boost flagging growth after lowering interest rates almost to zero and buying $1.7 trillion of securities, are weighing strategies for raising inflation expectations as well as expanding the balance sheet by purchasing Treasuries, according to minutes of the Fed's Sept. 21 meeting released yesterday.

Some Fed officials are concerned that expectations of lower inflation will become self-fulfilling, damping demand by increasing borrowing costs in real terms, the minutes said. By encouraging Americans to believe prices will start rising at a faster pace, the Fed would reduce inflation-adjusted interest rates and stimulate the economy. Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said in 2003 that Japan could beat deflation by using a "publicly announced, gradually rising price-level target."

"The Fed is on the verge of actively targeting a higher inflation rate," said Dan Greenhaus, chief economic strategist at Miller Tabak & Co. in New York. U.S. stocks advanced, sending benchmark indexes to five-month highs, the dollar fell and gold declined for the first time in three days after the minutes were released.

Trying to raise inflation expectations is untested in the U.S. The policy may backfire if actual inflation drifts higher than the Fed would like, potentially eroding gains won in the early 1980s by former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker, who raised interest rates as high as 20 percent to subdue prices.

'Elegant' Theory

"The theory is elegant, but it's unclear in practice whether short-term moves in inflation expectations really drive real growth," said Dean Maki, chief U.S. economist at Barclays Capital Inc. in New York and a former Fed researcher.

Jim O'Sullivan, global chief economist at MF Global Ltd. in New York, said in a Bloomberg Television interview that the biggest risk is "boosting long-term inflation expectations more than they lower real interest rates."

Bernanke on Oct. 15 will deliver a speech on "Monetary Policy Objectives and Tools in a Low-Inflation Environment" at a conference at the Fed Bank of Boston. Some of the panels at the conference will deal with Japan's experience of deflation.

The Sept. 21 statement saying the Fed "is prepared to provide additional accommodation if needed" was meant to accord "with the members' sense that such accommodation may be appropriate before long," the minutes said. The Standard and Poor's 500 index is up 2.6 percent since Sept. 21 and rose 0.4 percent yesterday to 1,169.77.

Consumer Confidence

The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan consumer confidence survey showed consumers expect an inflation rate of 2.2 percent over the next 12 months in September, the lowest in a year and down from 2.7 percent in August.

The Fed gave several options for raising short-term price expectations, including providing more information on the inflation rate policy makers consider consistent with their long-term goals and targeting a path for the price level. For the first time, the Fed said it could also target a path for nominal gross domestic product, which isn't adjusted for inflation.

"The minutes are one of their key communication tools, but it's not clear what that approach will be," Maki said.

The report provides more detail on the timing and components of potential easing actions without giving the amount of any additional asset purchases by the Fed. Since the meeting, weaker-than-forecast job growth in September and comments by policy makers, including New York Fed President William Dudley, have fueled speculation that the central bank will soon start a second wave of unconventional easing.

Projection for Purchases

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. economists are projecting that the Fed will announce $500 billion of purchases at the next meeting Nov. 2-3.

"They're still ironing out the details," said Chris Low, chief economist at FTN Financial in New York. At the same time, "if we don't get an announcement in the next meeting I think we'd see quite a bit of disappointment in the bond market and the stock market," Low said.

Bond traders expect the Fed's actions to generate higher prices. Their inflation expectations for the next five years, measured by the breakeven rate between nominal and inflation- indexed bonds, rose to 1.47 percent from 1.2 percent on Sept. 20, the day before the Fed's meeting. Gold prices hit a record $1,366 an ounce on Oct. 7.

Removing Punch Bowl

"The bottom line is, they are trying to reflate, and the market is concerned that historically they have always been late in removing the punch bowl," said Richard Schlanger, a vice president at Pioneer Investments Inc. in Boston who helps oversee $18 billion. "We are going to be very judicious in our asset allocations here."

Moderate growth and 9.6 percent unemployment are curbing price gains, prompting U.S. central bankers to warn for the second time in a decade that inflation is too low.

Inflation, measured by the personal consumption expenditures price index, minus food and energy, has been below the Fed's goal for five consecutive months. The price measure rose 1.4 percent for the 12 months ending August. Prices excluding food and energy have gained at a 1 percent annual pace in the three months through August.

The European Central Bank and Bank of England are among central banks that target an inflation rate through monetary policy. The Fed, by contrast, has no formal inflation objective; instead, Fed officials state a long-run inflation rate they see as consistent with achieving the legislative mandates of stable prices and maximum employment.

Inflation Target

The FOMC could adopt a combination of inflation targeting and price-level targeting to get inflation expectations up, said Mark Gertler, a New York University economist and research co- author with Bernanke.

The Fed could restate its commitment to keep inflation rising annually at around 1.7 percent to 2 percent. At the same time, the FOMC could announce some tolerance for inflation above that goal to make up for recent undershooting of those rates, Gertler said.

That would help convince the public that the Fed wasn't going to raise rates rapidly if inflation moved above 2 percent, he said. Such a strategy "tells the market that the farther we undershoot, the more aggressive we are going to be," he said.

A nominal GDP target is "a pretty unlikely outcome," Gertler said. "I don't think it is on the table as a serious proposal."

Attends Meeting

The Fed's consideration of price-level targeting may draw on research co-written by Gauti Eggertsson, a New York Fed researcher, and Michael Woodford of Columbia University. Eggertsson attended the FOMC meeting last month, his second since joining the Fed in 2004.

Eggertsson and Woodford said in a 2003 paper that a publicly announced price-level target is better than targeting the rate of inflation as a way to increase expectations. Bernanke cited their work in a 2003 speech about monetary policy in Japan.

Woodford said in an interview it would be "desirable" for the Fed to commit to keep rates low to ensure prices rise along a path identified by the central bank.

If people expect higher inflation, "that's a reason to spend more," said Woodford, who as a professor worked with Bernanke in the Princeton University economics department.

Japan Policy

Japan, by contrast, tied its low-rate policy last decade to an inflation rate instead of the price level. Woodford declined to discuss his talks with Fed officials.

Dudley, who serves as FOMC vice chairman and is the only regional Fed president to vote at every meeting, said in an Oct. 1 speech that, for example, "if inflation in 2011 were 0.5 percentage point below the Fed's inflation objective, the Fed might aim to offset this miss by an additional 0.5 percentage- point rise in the price level in future years."

"There's some evidence that inflation expectations are playing a role both in limiting demand and keeping prices low," FTN's Low said.

"You look at housing now and one of the reasons people aren't buying is they expect they can get a better price if they wait," he said. "If that behavior spreads into other markets, it could be a real problem."

To contact the reporter on this story: Scott Lanman in Washington at slanman@bloomberg.net Joshua Zumbrun in Washington at jzumbrun@bloomberg.net .

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christopher Wellisz at cwellisz@bloomberg.net

Find out more about Bloomberg for iPhone: http://m.bloomberg.com/iphone/


Sent from my iPhone

MOST ETHICAL CONGRESS EVER: BREAKING: Harry Reid Hit With Ethics Complaint….



Sent from my iPhone

MTV Gives Obama Free Hour of Air Time, Denies He’ll be Political

MTV's parent company Viacom is giving President Obama an hour of free air time for a town hall meeting on Thursday, claiming that the event will not be political. Because of that claim, a spokeswoman says, Viacom will not be extending the same courtesy to any Republicans.

Human Events reports that the TV special, called "A Conversation with President Obama," will be live and commercial-free on six Viacom networks at 4 p.m. on Thursday, including MTV, BET, and CMT.

According to Viacom spokeswoman Kelly McAndrew, the company is adamant that the event will not be political, and therefore does not require equal time for someone who may think differently than Obama about the country's issues. That's despite the fact November's mid-term elections are about three weeks away.

"We're not giving an hour of free time to the president to freely express his views. We're hosting a town hall with 250 young people to ask questions of the president," McAndrew told HE.

"This is not a campaign appearance. This is a town hall discussion."

The White House conceived of the concept and asked for the commercial-free TV time, according to Viacom. However, MTV and BET already had "asks" into the White House to do something with the president.

While McAndrew said that the audience's questions would not be submitted in advance, she did admit that the the audience members would be pre-screened to ensure "diverse" inquiries.

Read the entire article at Human Events.








Sent from my iPhone

Reagan Recovery vs. Obama Recovery in Pictures

http://blog.heritage.org/2010/10/13/reagan-recovery-vs-obama-recovery-in-pictures/

According to The National Bureau of Economic Research, the most recent recession began in December 2007, lasted 18 months, and ended in June 2009. The recession which most closely resembles the most recent one began in July 1981, lasted 16 months, and ended in November 1982. No two recessions are exactly the same. No two recoveries are exactly the same. But as two-time Super Bowl champion coach Bill Parcells still liked to say: "You are what your record says you are." Heritage Foundation Senior Fellow J.D. Foster read us the score:

At this stage of the Reagan recovery from the last deep recession in the early 1980s, the economy had created almost 4 million jobs, or 6 million jobs when adjusting for the size of the labor force. In contrast, under Obama the economy has lost nearly a half million jobs since the recovery began; the growth rate remains stuck around 1 percent; and the economy is sufficiently weak that the Federal Reserve is about to embark on yet another round of quantitative easing to fend off deflation.

As the chart to the right shows, 16 months into the Reagan Recovery the nation's unemployment had already fallen a full three points. By contrast, 16 months into the Obama Recovery and the nation's unemployment rate is actually .1 points higher. Why was the Reagan Recovery so strong and why is the Obama Recovery so weak?

These policies reflect the different governing philosophies of these two presidents. In his First Inaugural Address, President Reagan said: "In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. … In the days ahead, I will propose removing the roadblocks that have slowed our economy and reduced productivity."

President Obama, however, sees a much larger role for the federal government. As he said on the campaign trail in 2008: "I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."

So far that hasn't been the case.



Sent from my iPhone

The EPA Ozone Regs: Another Obama Jobs Killer

http://blog.heritage.org/2010/10/13/the-epa-ozone-regs-another-obama-jobs-killer/

Just two years ago, President George Bush's Environmental Protection Agency lowered the ozone standard from 84 parts per billion (ppb) to the current 75 ppb. Ozone is a naturally occurring molecule made up of three oxygen atoms that can be unhealthy at high levels. It is often created when vehicle and industrial emissions (from manufacturers and refineries) react with sunlight.

The EPA normally waits at least five years before revising their ozone standard, but their is nothing normal about the Obama EPA. In January 2010, the Obama EPA proposed reducing the again, this time to 60 ppb. The EPA claims this will save as many as 12,000 lives a year and as much as $100 billion annually in health care spending by 2020. But then there is the cost.

According to a new study by the Manufacturers Alliance are huge including $1 trillion in annual attainment costs by 2020 and over 7 million jobs lost. Some of the states hardest hit? Washington would lose 234,000 jobs, Ohio 296,000, Pennsylvania 351,000, and Louisiana 983,000, and Texas would lose a whopping 1.7 million jobs.



Sent from my iPhone

Obama: Republicans Will Have to Learn to Get Along With Me

President Obama reveals in a magazine article due out Sunday that he is weighing what to do if Republicans win the House majority next month, and has come up with a novel approach: Make the GOP work with him. 









Sent from my iPhone

Awesome: White House attacks on Rove’s group lead to massive influx of donations

Backfire.


Actually, that's only half of what makes it awesome. What makes it fully awesome is that, thanks to the new money, they can now target House seats that they otherwise would have had to pass on. Alternate headline: "Are we sure Obama's not trying to help the GOP take back the House?" American Crossroads, a [...]

Read this post »








Sent from my iPhone

Michelle Obama Begs Voters to Give Her Husband More Time to Forge the Change

Please! No more change…
Barack Obama is the worst jobs president since the Great Depression. The Obama-Pelosi economic plan resulted in a cumulative 7.5 million jobs deficit. By every objective measure the democrat's Trillion dollar stimulus bomb was a complete disaster.

Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi tripled the national deficit last year by nearly a trillion dollars – something unheard of in our nation's history.

After an unheard of record deficit last year of $1.4 Trillion the democrats managed to compile a $1.3 Trillion deficit this year.

Instead of focusing on the economy the past two years the radicals in Washington beat up on business and rammed through an unpopular nationalized health care entitlement program. Today 61% of voters want the democratic law repealed.

Today, at a rally for far left Democrat Russ Feingold, the First Lady begged voters for more time to forge change.
The Sydney Morning Herald reported:

US First Lady Michelle Obama yesterday poignantly said she felt the economic anxiety of hurting Americans, but pleaded with them to give her husband more time to forge the change he promised.

"I think that many of us came into this expecting to see all the change we talked about happen at once, right away, the minute Barack walked through the Oval Office door," she said…

"I know that a lot of folks are still hurting, I know that for a lot of folks, change hasn't come fast enough."

The First Lady was making her debut on the 2010 campaign trail, three weeks ahead of congressional elections in which voters are expected to inflict heavy losses on Democrats which could stall her husbands reform agenda.

"We all understood that change takes struggle, and sacrifice and compromise," Obama said, campaigning for endangered Democratic Senator Russ Feingold in midwestern Wisconsin.

With pollsters pointing to an "enthusiasm gap" between Barack Obama's supporters and conservatives outraged by his presidency, the White House is trying to drive the president's diverse, youthful coalition to the polls.

"In the end, our campaign was never just about just pulling one man and putting him into the White House," she said, urging supporters to remember how the election night in 2008 and Obama's inauguration in January 2009.

"We were excited, we were energised, we were hopeful … and the truth is, we have that same chance – and we have that same responsibility – today."

Obama said she came to the campaign "as a Mom" and realised what was at stake.

"I see it in the child whose dad has just been deployed and is trying to hard to be brave for his younger brothers and sisters."

"I see it in the child stuck in a crumbling school, who looks around and wonders 'what on earth is this going to mean for my future?

She sounds a bit ridiculous talking about the suffering of the average American. After all, she just returned from a royal vacation in southern Spain.








Sent from my iPhone

FDR on welfare 1935: "The lessons of history … show conclusively that continued dependence upon reli

Turns out that liberal icon FDR was only a neo-statist. Or maybe he was a statist with reservations. Whatever he was, he has inflicted the United States with a chronic case of entitlemetitis. Sure it was unconstitutional. But what the heck? It's kept Democrats in power ever since. It is a cancer that continues to metastasize. It may have dawned on FDR, but he raped Lady Liberty nonetheless. From Human Events via moonbattery:
"The lessons of history … show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit."

These searing words about Depression-era welfare are from Franklin Roosevelt's 1935 State of the Union Address. FDR feared this self-reliant people might come to depend permanently upon government for the necessities of their daily lives. Like narcotics, such a dependency would destroy the fiber and spirit of the nation.

What brings his words to mind is news that 41.8 million Americans are on food stamps, and the White House estimates 43 million will soon be getting food stamps every month. …

What we have accepted today is a vast permanent underclass of scores of millions who cannot cope and must be carried by the rest of society — fed, clothed, housed, tutored, medicated at taxpayer's expense for their entire lives. We have a new division in America: those who pay a double fare, and those who forever ride free.
How to reverse it? More specifically, how to reverse it when more than 50% of Americans not only pay no federal income taxes, but get money back from those that do? Right now we are here: Not only does bottom 47% of taxpayers pay no federal income tax, but the bottom 40% GET MONEY BACK! That goes right along in consistency with a prior post of mine: 60 Minutes/Vanity Fair Poll: 50% of Americans that don't pay taxes thinks "rich" people ought to pay more, even though top 1% pay more than bottom 95%. Like a drug addict addicted to heroin, separating the dependent from the drug will be painful. At least during the transition. But to get back to a sustainable civilization, we need to go back to first principles. Which is the whole point why the US Constitution was written. The ruling class has drifted away from it, with the approval of activist courts. Follow our founding document and we'll be fine once again.
Government dependency is a drug







Sent from my iPhone

Jerry Brown: "We Need More Welfare and Fewer Jobs"

If you think the situation in California is bad now, wait until Governor Moonbeam gets reinstated. Here's his economic policy:

The conventional viewpoint says we need a jobs program and we need to cut welfare. Just the opposite! We need more welfare and fewer jobs. Jobs for every American is doomed to failure because of modern automation and production. We ought to recognize it and create an income-maintenance system so every single American has the dignity and the wherewithal for shelter, basic food, and medical care. I'm talking about welfare for all.

You see, when everyone is on welfare, we can just let robots do all the work while we sit around our government-provided homes and watch Oprah all day. Then we'll all be Democrats. Utopia!

If a certifiable lunatic like Jerry Brown is the best Dems can do for governor of the largest state in the union at a time of severe crisis, it's time for this execrable party to crawl into the dustbin of history.

Jerry-Brown.jpg
It's medication time.

Via Big Government. On a tip from Gregory of Yardale.








Sent from my iPhone

Figures on government spending and debt

WASHINGTON (AP) — Figures on government spending and debt (last six digits are eliminated). The government's fiscal year runs Oct. 1 through Sept. 30.







Sent from my iPhone

EPA funnels taxpayer money to dozens of liberal community activist groups

The EPA recently listed 76 groups that will share almost $2 million in the form of "environmental justice grants"







Sent from my iPhone

Media Swarm: Campbell's Hamas Halal

In the coming months, all our Halal-certified products will have the ISNA logo HamasCampbells directly on their labels, so you can easily identify them at your grocery store ....Campbell's website.

I have been on the receiving end of many queries on my opposition to Campbells halal certification pogram (pun intended) by the Muslim Brotherhood front ISNA. Even the NY Times profile piece on me this past Sunday pulled the Warhol quote off my post on it (nothing else, of course).

The cultural jihad rages on, and I will rage against it. Here is a recent exchange with the AP. Let's see how she reports it. If her report distorts my position, I will name her and fisk it.

AP: Why do you think that Campbell Soup should be boycotted?

GELLER: Campbells is getting its halal certification from ISNA. ISNA was named a Muslim Brotherhood front in the largest terrorist funding trial in American history. This is an organization with ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood whose stated aim (according to a captured, internal document entered into evidence in the Holy Land trial) is to eliminate and destroy Western civilization from within.

AP: What do you say about the argument that the evidence produced at the Holyland Terror Trial was old?

GELLER: Is this the new narrative - that the objective of the Muslim Brotherhood is old? It is unchanging, rooted in Islamic text and teachings and evidenced by the facts on the ground. And what was done to address ISNA's MB ties after Holy Land? It's like it never happened? Outrageous.

 

 


AP: What recent activities of the ISNA have been cause for concern?

 
GELLER: The recent ISNA conferences promoted the most vicious Jew hatred and Islamic supremacist conspiracy theories.  They have never repudiated Hamas or Hezballah. Instead their rhetoric implies tacit support.

AP: What do you say about the fact that their position paper about themselves says that they are against terrorism?

GELLER: What is their definition of terrorism? Anerican operations in Iraq and Afghanistan?  Israeli self defense? Who do they consider the victims and the victimized? Can you point me to this?

AP: I know you are busy, but it would be appreciated if you can send me any documents that link ISNA to terrorism. Thank you.

 







Sent from my iPhone

'We Made a Mistake'

Another heartwarming socialized medicine story.Oops.A patient who was given six months to live after being diagnosed with terminal cancer sold off all his precious possessions and gave away his dog - only to be told by doctors he wasn't going to die after all.Malcolm McMahon set about getting his affairs in order after a blundering doctor told him he had terminal liver cancer.He sold off most of







Sent from my iPhone

Video of Chamber of Commerce VP: When did Hope and change turn into fear and smear?

Via Greg Hengler on YouTube:
The whole hope and change pronouncement was a smoke-screen. A figment of one's imagination who wanted to believe something that wasn't true. It was a drug and a lot of people got addicted to hopeium. It was of course not real, and instead of offering hope and change, it delivered neither and in fact made things worse. Our community organizer-in-chief knows only how to demonize, not to unite. As Allahpundit puts it, "At first it was Rush Limbaugh for saying "I hope he fails," then it was the health-care townhall "angry mobs," then it was Fox, then it was the tea party, then John Boehner, then Palin, now it's the Chamber of Commerce. There's always someone standing at the foot of the cross, sippin' on a Slurpee, while our poor unappreciated president spends trillions that we don't have in order to redeem our sins. Look at it this way, Chamber members: It's not that The One has it in for you. It was simply your turn." Allah also posts this vid of Brit Hume lowering the boom via Newsbusters:
Get off the Hopeium people!







Sent from my iPhone

Are Democrats really stupid enough to threaten 401(k) plans?

Honestly, I don't even know what to say about this. Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa is threatening 401(k) plans — insisting Democrats can use the lame duck, post-defeat session of Congress to ram through a measure that would seize your personal 401(k) plans and use them to prop up the union pension plans that are [...]







Sent from my iPhone

Obama double-talk continues as he claims he wants bi-partisanship…on his terms for his policies

RWBNews:  Obama is talking out of both sides of his mouth.  Everything will be fine if the Republicans agree with him and work towards his destruction of America, according to his skewed rationalizations.  In one breath he says he made mistakes, in the next he says the Congress will work to implementing laws as they are meant.  Which laws?  Immigration?  Voter intimidation? Spending?  Education?  Total socialism of the USA?

By Jordan Fabian  for The Hill

President Obama admitted to "tactical" missteps during the first two-years of his administration and suggested it might be easier to work with Republicans during the next two years.

In a wide-ranging interview with The New York Times to be published Sunday, Obama said he let himself be perceived as "the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat," as opposed to the new model of politician some thought he would be following his 2008 campaign.

With regard to his first large legislative effort, the $787 billion federal stimulus, it took too long for him to realize "there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects," Obama said.

The Times's Peter Baker wrote: "Perhaps he should not have proposed tax breaks as part of his stimulus and instead 'let the Republicans insist on the tax cuts' so it could be seen as a bipartisan

Though Obama has accused Republicans of opposing his agenda for political gain, in the interview the president said whatever the result of the midterms, his relationship the GOP would be different starting in 2011.

"It may be that regardless of what happens after this election, they feel more responsible," he said. "Either because they didn't do as well as they anticipated, and so the strategy of just saying no to everything and sitting on the sidelines and throwing bombs didn't work for them, or they did reasonably well, in which case the American people are going to be looking to them to offer serious proposals and work with me in a serious way."

Obama also predicted Congress would spend more of its time in the next two years ensuring the implementation of healthcare reform and the financial regulatory overhaul.

"Even if I had the exact same Congress, even if we don't lose a seat in the Senate and we don't lose a seat in the House, I think the rhythms of the next two years would inevitably be different from the rhythms of the first two years," Obama said. "There's going to be a lot of work in this administration just doing things right and making sure that new laws are stood up in the ways they're intended."

Even with the slow pace of the economic recovery, which has also created a tough environment for Democrats and tamped down his approval ratings, Obama did not express regret.

"The mythology has emerged somehow that we ran this flawless campaign, I never made a mistake, that we were master communicators, everything worked in lock step," he said. "And somehow now, as president, things are messy and they don't always work as planned and people are mad at us. That's not how I look at stuff, because I remember what the campaign was like. And it was just as messy and just as difficult. And there were all sorts of moments when our supporters lost hope, and it looked like we weren't going to win. And we're going through that same period here.

"I make no apologies for having set high expectations for myself and for the country, because I think we can meet those expectations," he added. "Now, the one thing that I will say — which I anticipated and can be tough — is the fact that in a big, messy democracy like this, everything takes time. And we're not a culture that's built on patience."


swenbwr







Sent from my iPhone

Obama approves $900 MILLION to Palestine in the latest Mid-East Peace talks

RWBNews:  Obama signed a waiver to send more money to the Palestinian Authority with less disclosure required by the O Administration, as we posted here.  It has now come to light that the PA is going to be getting$900 MILLION of our tax dollars under the guise of mid-east peace.  Why was the waiver necessary, what does the O Administration NOT want us to know and WHY is the PA getting $900 million dollars?

Israeli media watchdog Itamar Marcus makes a career of following the Palestinian press. His website provides timely and accurate translations of the Arabic language broadcasts and publications that are watched and read by the Palestinian public on the West Bank of the Jordan River and in the Gaza Strip.

It's well worth our while as Americans to pay more attention to what the so-called Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) is doing. That's because we American taxpayers are footing the bill for much of it. President Obama and Secrtary Hillary Clinton have promised $900 million in U.S. funds to the PLO, our supposed "peace partners" in the latest round of Mideast peace talks.

One story is typical of the PLO approach to peace. Late last year, a 45-year old rabbi, father of seven, was ambushed in his car by four members of the Palestinian Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade. Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) located three of the killers and killed them.

Here's what our peace partner, the PLO's Mahmoud Abbas, did then:

PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas declared the killers "Shahids" (holy Martyrs) and sent his personal emissary to visit the families:

"Secretary General of the President's Office, Tayeb Abd Al-Rahim, conveyed condolences on behalf of President Mahmoud Abbas to the residents of Nablus and to the families of the three Shahids [Martyrs] for the Martyrdom of their sons, who were assassinated by Israeli occupation forces yesterday morning. He conveyed to the fighting families letters of condolences from the President [Abbas] and updated them as to [Abbas's] decision to declare them as Shahids [Martyrs] of the Palestinian revolution…"

Tayeb Abd Al-Rahim: "Without doubt, what the [Israeli] occupation authorities have carried out is a wild and barbaric act and a deliberate, malicious assassination in cold blood."

Our tax dollars at work. Mahmoud Abbas and Tayeb Abd Al-Rahim are part of the notoriously corrupt organization that runs the West Bank. It's called the Palestinian Authority, but it remains to be seen how much authority it actually has. Abbas has declined to hold scheduled elections, fearing that Hamas, which won overwhelmingly in Gaza, would win on the West Bank, too. So, with U.S. financial and diplomatic support, Abbas clings to power.

He's a regular and honored visitor to the Obama White House. This is a man whose entire career was made as faithful lieutenant to Yasser Arafat. Arafat won the Nobel Peace Prize for his famed "handshake" with Israel's Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in a deal brokered by then-President Bill Clinton. Arafat is the one who invented airline hijacking for terror purposes. Soon after shaking hands with Rabin, Arafat was up to his old tricks.

He instigated yet another of his intifadas—uprisings—sparked by Arab teenagers throwing stones, with deadly accuracy, at Israeli soldiers. If the Arab boys are shot and killed by the IDF soldiers defending themselves—so much the better. Abbas has more "martyrs" to celebrate and the PLO gets some favorable TV coverage in the credulous Western media.

The United States has been pursuing a phantom for more than twenty years. We have bought into the fiction that the Arafat-Abbas clique—this so-called Palestinian Authority– is something other than what it is: a murderous and corrupt gang of thugs.

The errors in U.S. foreign policy in this region are bi-partisan. It was the first Bush administration that sought to extend an olive branch and an open hand of friendship to the Arafat-Abbas gang in 1989. We were told then that if the PLO would just give up its campaign of terrorism against the Israelis, acknowledge the right of Israel to exist, then the United States would help the impoverished Palestinian people with development funds and sponsor their path to statehood.

The PLO never gave up its plans. To this day, the destruction of Israel remains a goal of the PLO. The PLO "leaders" can readily tell us they renounce terrorism because they don't consider the murder of Israeli citizens—in pizza parlors, in schools, in hospitals—to be terrorism. They call it resistance and they call those who are killed on these strikes shahids—martyrs.

It's time for Americans to take a cold look at what twenty years of takkiya—the Arabic word for deception—have gotten us. President Reagan left office in 1989. He spoke about our dealings with the then-Soviet Union. He hoped for peace, and he said, "Trust, but verify." He said one more thing we need to apply to our role in the Mideast: "Don't be afraid to see what you see."

I look at the latest round of bogus peace talks and I see a discredited PLO boss sitting down to make promises to the Israelis he has no intention of keeping. If he actually did keep those promises, he would be murdered by his own cutthroat followers.

I see American honor stained, American power diminished, and American money wasted.

What do you see?

swenbwr







Sent from my iPhone

Now He Tells Us… Obama Admits There’s No Such Thing as a Shovel Ready Job

Back on March 3, 2009, 14 days after democrats rammed through their record $787 non-Stimulus package, Barack Obama told Americans that those shovels were already hitting the ground.

Well, it's been a year and a half and we all know that the shovels weren't hitting anything. The stimulus was a horrible failure.

Even Obama agrees. Obama told the press this week that there is not such a thing as a shovel ready job.
The Caucus reported, via Evan Coyne Maloney:

In the magazine article, Mr. Obama reflects on his presidency, admitting that he let himself look too much like "the same old tax-and-spend Democrat," realized too late that "there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects" and perhaps should have "let the Republicans insist on the tax cuts" in the stimulus.

Now he tells us.








Sent from my iPhone

Video of Interior Sec Ken Salazar: "We Do Not Have A Choice" But To Go With "Clean Energy" (That Doe

There is no such thing as "clean" energy. Some energy is cleanER than others, but it is impossible for there to be truly clean energy, as I wrote in this prior post: What is renewable energy? It is pie in the sky, but no free lunch - Part 1. An excerpt from that post: Let me just take solar for example as to what I mean by necessary pollution as dictated by the 2nd law. Although there are no emissions when in operation (albeit it shades a swath of ground that is itself an environmental impact which is why politicians have essentially stopped further production of large-scale solar facilities in places like southern California), there are plenty of emissions, energy usage, and chemical waste in the production. For one, many solar panels rely on polysilicon being manufactured in large quantities and at a high quality. A the byproduct of polysilicon production is silicon tetrachloride, a highly toxic substance that poses a large environmental hazard. Wherever silicon tetrachloride is dumped, the land becomes totally infertile. Even liberal outlets like the Washington Post have taken note:

"The land where you dump or bury it will be infertile. No grass or trees will grow in the place... It is like dynamite -- it is poisonous, it is polluting. Human beings can never touch it," said Ren Bingyan, a professor at the School of Material Sciences at Hebei Industrial University.
Even recycling that compound takes huge amounts of energy, itself generating its own pollution in one form or another. Farther down the production line, the gaseous compound nitrogen triflouride (NF3) is required for thin film solar cells (and 'environmentally friendly' energy-efficient LCD TVs - heh). The problem? That gas is 17,000 times more potent a greenhouse gas as CO2. In fact, the atmospheric concentration of nitrogen triflouride has quadrupled and according to NASA is increasing at a rate of about 11 percent per year. Thus my point - no technology in existence either in the real world or in someone's imagination is exempt from the 2nd law. There will always be necessary pollution no matter the technology. It's just that the pollution will take on different forms and exist in different places. Some pollution like that in solar technology is produced far away from where the panels operate, masking its negative impact, an impact that the MSM has been slow to report on which in turn cloaks it from a public willing to believe in fairytales painted green.

Which brings me to fairytales painted green. They are being done so by our political ruling class, of which the incompetent Secretary of Interior Ken Slazaar is one:
The YouTube caption reads:
Ken Salazar, the Secretary of the Interior stated at the American Wind Energy Association in Atlantic City, New Jersey on Wednesday at their North American Offshore Wind Conference that 'We Do Not Have A Choice' But To Go With 'Clean Energy'
Don't even get me started on what it takes to manufacture wind turbines or the pollution that that takes. Suffices to say that I doubt in most cases that the wind turbine produces more energy from wind than it takes to build it in the first place. Salazaars assertion in the above video is tantamount to Bluto blurting this out:







Sent from my iPhone

Heritage Foundation

DrudgeFeed.com - Drudge Report RSS feed

RedState

Right Wing News

RenewAmerica

Hot Air » Top Picks

Conservative Outpost

Conservative Examiner

Michelle Malkin

Big Government

Big Journalism

Big Hollywood

Pajamas Media