Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Michelle Malkin Schools Obama on Islamic Jihad (Video)
Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:
55% of Arabs surveyed believe offensive words or actions justify violence.
Millions of Muslims believe that violence against civilian targets in the name of Islam can be justified.
25% of younger US Muslims approve of suicide bombings.
1 of 4 citizens in Turkey believe that blowing up innocents is an acceptable practice.
Less than half of Pakistanis think it is a good idea to "pursue and capture Al Qaeda or Taliban fighters."
Tonight Michelle Malkin explained jihad to our President Obama who flubbed the question this week in India.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Gateway Pundit using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
Robert Welch: "America Will be Destroyed from Within" (1958)
Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:
In this 1958 speech, Robert Welch, founder of the often maligned John Birch Society states that America is going to be destroyed from within. Mr Welch goes on to list point by point how this will be carried out.
If more Americans had listened back in 1958, the country would not be in the situation it is now in. Everyone should now listen to Robert Welch's crucial message and take action - before the opportunity to restore America has passed us by.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to New Zeal using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
Indian Communists Make Exception for Obama
Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:
What do Indian Communists know that most American voters don't?
From MyNews.in
"Since I was told that the communists have been a part of mainstream politics of India throughout, I feel really pleased to meet an Indian Communist." Barack Obama told Communist Party of India (Marxist) Politburo member Sitaram Yechury at the Rashtrapati Bhawan banquet as they were introduced and both shook hands.
Yechury told Obama that the Indian communists have been in the political mainstream "throughout".
Marking a departure from their past practice, leaders and MPs of the CPI(M) and the Communist Party of India I, both militantly anti-US stance, attended Obama's speech in Parliament on November 8.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to New Zeal using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
Iran and Saudi Arabia In Bid For Seats On New UN Women Agency UPDATE: Iran Rejected!
Iran and Saudi Arabia may get seats on the board of a new UN super-agency to promote women's rights, prompting outrage from human rights and women's activists.
Obviously, given Iran's and Saudi Arabia's record on women's rights, giving them a seat on this UN Council would be a travesty!
Via The BBC -
"We think it sends a horrible signal to women around the world who are looking with hope to the agency," said Philippe Bolopian of Human Rights Watch. "Given the abysmal record the two countries have on women's rights, their candidacy will be seen as a provocation by women around the world."
The agency is known as UN Women. After four years of delays and difficult negotiations, it was approved by the General Assembly in July and is meant to begin work in January.
It brings together four existing UN bodies into a single high-powered entity. Its aim is to increase the focus on and funding for women's issues and, through its head, Chile's former president, Michelle Bachelet, raise their profile within the United Nations.
So the vote for the 41 member executive board, set for 10 November, is a key step.
Saudi Arabia is running uncontested for one of two slots allocated to emerging donor nations. Iran's name has been put forward by the Asian group as part of a 10-nation slate, which is facing unexpected competition from a candidate that entered the race last week.
Activists acknowledge that other countries on the list also have poor track records on human rights, but say these two in particular systematically discriminate against women through their legal systems.
In Saudi Arabia women are forbidden to drive, and cannot take significant decisions without the permission of a male relative.
And Iran drew international condemnation recently, when it was reported that a woman had been sentenced to death by stoning after being convicted of adultery and complicity in her husband's murder. The sentence has reportedly been changed to hanging, but she is now the focus of an international campaign to save her from execution.
It is not clear what impact a country's human rights record will have on the board, or exactly what influence the board itself will have.
Organizers have tried to keep the mandate as technical as possible, modelling it on those used by other UN development funds and programmes.
But issues related to women are deeply politicised at the UN. There could be fights over budget allocations and programme priorities not seen in other agencies. There is also a fear the board could get mired in debates over fundamental principles rather than surging ahead with empowering women in all spheres.
[...]
Those who have fought long and hard for UN Women are hoping that the board will be able to settle any political battles at the beginning of its tenure and move on quickly to the nuts and bolts of approving programmes and running audits.
Their fear is that the super-agency will become another UN forum for political battles, some of which have little to do with women's rights.
Political? You mean like this?
The UN Human Rights Council Accuses The U.S. of Human Rights Abuses.
The United States has for the first time faced the United Nations Human Rights Council over accusations of human rights violations.
[...]
Bush had shunned the UN Human Rights Council, saying it did not need to be scolded by countries such as Syria and Cuba whose own records on human rights were poor.
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the Republican Representative who is set to chair the House Foreign Affairs Committee when a new US Congress convenes in January, echoed those views on Friday.
She said that the 47-member Human Rights Council was "dominated by rogue regimes".
"Serial human rights abusers like Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela all hijacked the platform to attack the US for imaginary violations," she said.
"The US should walk out of this rogues' gallery and seek to build alternative forums that will actually focus on abuses and deny membership to abusers."
That's not going to happen. Instead the Obama administration will cede even more power (and money no doubt) to the UN. We have a different president now with a very different philosophy.
But Michael Posner, the US assistant secretary of state for democracy and human rights, told a news briefing after the council debate that the US got "a fair hearing".
"This is part of an ongoing process to engage with the Council and the UN," he said.
The council will issue its recommendations on Tuesday and the US delegation will indicate which of them are acceptable before reporting back in March when a final report is adopted.
UPDATE: Via Fox News -
The United Nations rejected on Wednesday Iran's bid for a seat to the board of the new U.N. agency to promote equality for women after fierce opposition from the United States and human rights groups to Tehran's treatment of women.
But the U.N. accepted the bid of Saudi Arabia, which is also opposed by human rights groups.
Iran, which has been criticized for its record on women's rights, received only 19 votes — short of the necessary 28 votes for approval.
Sent from my iPhone
President Obama Lied, Jobs Died, He Doesn’t Care: The Continuing Drilling Moratorium Through Permit
Hyperbolic headline? I think not. Consider how the Obama administration manipulated scientific findings (remember the promise to be scientific?). This from Politico:
"The White House edit of the original DOI draft executive summary led to the implication that the moratorium recommendation had been peer-reviewed by the experts," the IG report states, without judgment on whether the change was an intentional attempt to mislead the public.
The six-month ban on offshore drilling installed in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill became a major political issue over the summer, as Gulf State lawmakers and industry groups charged the White House with unfairly threatening thousands of jobs. House Republicans have said they plan on investigating the circumstances surrounding the moratorium when they take power next year.
Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and several other Gulf State members of Congress asked the Interior IG to investigate the moratorium and the peer review claim.
"The inspector general's finding that the blanket-drilling moratorium was driven by politics and not by science is bitter news for families who, because of it, lost their jobs, savings, and way of life," Cassidy said Tuesday. "Candidate Obama promised that he would guided by science, not ideology. If that were true, at least 12,000 jobs and 1.8 billion dollars of economic activity would have been saved on the Gulf Coast."
And as bad as that is, the government underestimated job losses from the moratorium. An analysis Dr. Joseph Mason reveals this:
Using the figures from a report, Dr. Mason re-ran his analysis using the government's own economic modeling and reveals the White House underestimated total jobs loss by 7,500 to 11,500 jobs in the Gulf states. In fact, based on the administration's data, Mason finds that that the region stands to lose:
· 19,536 jobs;
· $5 billion in economic output;
· $1.1 billion in earnings; and
· $239 million in state and local tax revenues during the 6-month moratorium.
Clearly, the administration's study represents another failed attempt to justify new anti-energy policies that will threaten the health of the U.S. economy and could undermine our economic recovery. View Dr. Mason's full analysis here.
Not only is this unscientific discrimination against an industry hated by this administration, it seems that this abuse is politically motivated–going after heavily Republican states and then harming the job outlook in states that have actually been showing growth.
This news is an abomination.
And worse, the regulations by the EPA have been foot-draggingly awful. So the moratorium lifted before the election for politically expedient reasons, but for all practical purposes, the EPA is still harassing the industry through the coagulated permitting process.
Solution? Defund the EPA. Two can play at this game. Republicans can just pull the money rug out from the EPA and investigate them non-stop. This is something all jobs-focused Americans should be happy about.
Nearly 20,000 jobs lost in the gulf and it's President Obama's fault.
Related Posts
- US Senate Briefing, Mon 8/23/10: Obama knew moratorium would kill 23,000 jobs
- GM – Chrysler Dealer Closings Was Politically Motivated Retribution; Obama Does Not Care About Jobs
- Is President Obama Trying To Kill The Gulf State Economies?
- New York Times: Pelosi Lied – Health Care Bill Costs $1.055 Trillion
- Today's hearing and Obama's speech tonight: A backgrounder
Sent from my iPhone
Soros-Funded Fanatics Call on Obama to Rule by Executive Order
Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:
You have to hand it to moonbats — it isn't easy to spin the trouncing they received last week into a victory for progressives:
It was progressives who won the mid-term elections, particularly incumbents in a socialist-founded congressional caucus that emerged from last week's ballots virtually unscathed, boasted an article published by the George Soros-funded Institute for Policy Studies, a Marxist-oriented think-tank in Washington, D.C.
If progressives were reelected, it's only because they represent the safest of safe districts for Democrats: blighted zones from which constructive people interested in working for a living have escaped, or regions like Raul Grijalva's district in southern Arizona that have effectively been annexed by Mexico. Yet somehow Soros's henchmoonbats derive from the record-setting spanking Dems received a mandate to ram through Obama's hard left agenda:
"Progressives won in the 2010 mid-term elections," wrote Karen Dolan, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, or IPS, and director of the Cities for Progress and Cities for Peace projects based at the radical organization.
"The Congressional Progressive Caucus, the largest caucus in the House Democratic Caucus at over 80 members, emerged virtually unscathed, losing only three members," she wrote, in the piece published on the IPS website.
In contrast, Blue Dogs were routed — precisely because they represent districts requiring some level of appeal to normal Americans.
Now this is starting to make sense:
"The veil of a happy Democratic governing majority is finally lifted. We didn't have it then; We don't have it now. But what we do have now is a more solidly progressive bunch of Dems in Congress and a president presumably less encumbered by the false illusion that playing nice will get him a date with the other team."
She went on to recommend that progressives "throw our support unabashedly behind the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and let's push Obama to finally do the right thing through as many Executive Orders as we can present to him."
In short, they are calling on Obama to openly disregard the will of the American people by circumventing Congress, in effect declaring himself dictator. It certainly wouldn't be inconsistent with the arrogance he displayed in his first two years, and it is the only way he will continue to advance his disastrous agenda if Republicans in Congress have any spine at all.
We'll know this is still America if he doesn't get away with it.
On a tip from AC.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Moonbattery using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
Michael Bloomberg Launches War on Soup
Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:
Ground Zero mosque advocate and NYC Mayor for Life Michael Bloomberg has turned his sanctimonious anti-food jihad against soup:
Mayor Bloomberg's latest health campaign — cutting salt intake — has targeted soup as one of the big sodium offenders to be taken down with new city ads.
The ads, which will be plastered on subways for the next two months, feature a half-opened can of soup with a geyser of salt spewing from the top and forming a heap around the can. …
An admitted fan of dumping salt on his own food, Bloomberg said the biggest culprits behind high-salt diets are the food processors that include copious amounts of sodium in canned soup and other prepared foods.
Guess who's paying for this nanny state nonsense? You are:
The campaign costs $370,000 — $130,000 of which comes from city taxpayers. The rest is covered by the federal government, a city Department of Health spokeswoman said.
Just as CO2 is required by plants, salt is an essential nutrient for people. That our moonbat rulers have convinced the pathologically gullible (i.e., other liberals) that ubiquitous and necessary elements of everyday life are public menaces is testimony both to their propaganda powers and to their stark raving insanity.
On a tip from James.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Moonbattery using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
Glenn Beck Show Discussion – November 10, 2010
Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:
Part 2 of exposing George Soros. More interesting revelations by Beck. Enjoy! Thanks to WatchGlennBeck.com for uploading the videos.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to The Right Scoop using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
Amnesty International Calls for Criminal Investigation Into Bush’s Admission...
Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:
The far left former human rights group Amnesty International today called for an investigation in George Bush's recent admission of so-called "torture."
Former President George Bush said information obtained from terrorist suspects through "waterboarding" prevented attacks on London.
Iran Press News reported:
The London-based Amnesty International (AI) has called for a criminal investigation into former US President George W. Bush's admission of torture.
The rights group's call comes after Bush confirmed in his recently released memoirs, Decision Points, that he authorized the use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" against detainees held in secret US custody.
Exactly six days after the September 11 attacks, Bush authorized the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to set up secret detention facilities outside the US.
Amnesty claims multiple human rights violations were committed against detainees in the name of the so-called 'war on terror.'
Additionally, in an 8 November 2010 interview with Matt Lauer on NBC, Bush stated that he had authorized the use of "water boarding" and other "enhanced interrogation techniques" against alleged "high-value detainees." During the interview, Bush focused on the case of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
"Would it be OK for a foreign country to waterboard an American citizen?" Lauer asked.
"It's all I ask is that people read the book. And they can reach the same conclusion. If they'd have made the same decision I made or not," replied Bush.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Gateway Pundit using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
Dr. Drew Predicts ‘Massive Flight’ of Physicians & Hospital Closures Because...
Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to The Blaze - Stories using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
‘The Three Little Pigs Revisited’: New Version With Recycled Houses and ‘Mis...
Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:
Remember the childhood story "The Three Little Pigs"? Complete with animals, action, and some life lessons about not taking the easiest route, the tale has become a classic. And despite variations over the years, the core story remains the same. Until now.
A new version of the story is now popping up in the classroom as part of the the fourth grade reading textbook Storytown: Winning Catch 4. In that book's version, the wolf has a sudden heart attack while trying to blow down the third little pig's adobe house. The three little pigs rush to his aid, save him, and while trying to flee from him once recovered, realize that the whole "huff and puff and blow your house down" thing was a simple "lack of communication": the wolf actually wanted to move in with the pigs and was testing each abode's structural security.
The story is complete with housing shortages and houses made of recycled newspaper and aluminum. An electronic version can be viewed here by picking theme two, lesson eight.
One reader, however, sent The Blaze a two-page excerpt from the updated version, which is being used in at least one school in Shelby county, Alabama:
This isn't the first time the pigs have faced scrutiny. In 2008, another version of "The Three Little Pigs" came under fire for not being politically correct. Then, a British educational system award panel turned down a new version of the story called "The Three Little Cowboy Builders" because it was offensive to Muslims, Asians, and builders.
"Is it true that all builders are cowboys, builders get their work blown down, and builders are like pigs?" a panel of judges asked.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to The Blaze - Stories using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
Skeptics Not Convinced ‘Missile’ Was a Plane
Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:
In a statement released to the news media Wednesday afternoon, the Pentagon says that an airplane and not a missile launch was the likely cause of a large vapor trail seen in the skies off Southern California's coast Monday. A local CBS affiliate captured images of the vapor trail that many viewers thought resembled the cloudy track of a missile in flight, but military officials said they did not know of any rockets being launched in the area.
Defense Department spokesman Col. Dave Lapan says that officials are "satisfied" with reports identifying the phenomenon was an airplane vapor trail distorted by camera angle, winds and other environmental factors. In addition, he says military experts have studied the video and checked with any government which might have been involved in a missile launch and none reported having launched one.
But despite the DoD's assurance, many people remain skeptical about the military's response.
An advisory posted Monday by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) — a sub-agency of the Department of Defense — has subsequently raised a number of questions. In a warning to mariners in the "eastern north Pacific," the NGA advisory coincidentally reported that areas off the coast of southern California would be in the "naval air warfare center sea range," and susceptible to "intermittent missile firing operations" this week.
The advisory noted that "vessels may be requested to alter course" in the area "due to firing operations" and that navigators should "maintain continuous guard while within the range." The geographical coordinates encompassing the noted sea range correspond to the reported area in which Monday's "mystery missile" was spotted. (See range No. 18 on map of NGA navigational warnings)
Vessels traveling to and from California ports in the vicinity of the sea range were instructed to "transit via the Santa Barbara Channel and within nine miles offshore vicinity of Point Mugu or to cross the area southwest of San Nicolas Island between sunset and sunrise.
Monday's NGA warning also appeared in Tuesday's broadcast for mariners, noting that missile activity would proceed throughout the week. However, Wednesday's advisory made no mention of continuing missile activity.
Eyewitness accounts Monday estimated the approximate location of the trajectory "as west of Los Angeles, north of Catalina Island, and approximately 35 miles out to sea."
Feedback into The Blaze suggested the anomaly could have been an inter-continental ballistic missile (ICBM) launched from a U.S. submarine off the California coastline. Sources have since confirmed no such launch took place.
However, further investigations have revealed that the noted San Nicolas Island (SNI) — a nine-mile long strip of land about 60 miles south of Point Mugu — is actually home to a U.S. Navy weapons testing and training facility. According to the Navy, SNI is "critical to performing the Sea Range mission and provides a cornerstone for supporting a wide variety of test, evaluation, training and experimentation operations, including surface-to-air, surface-to-surface, air-to-air, air-to-surface, missile defense, fleet training and large-scale joint experimentation scenarios."
The Navy has owned and operated various weapons tests on the island since 1933. The island is coincidentally located at the center of the NGA's missile advisory range:
The Blaze reached out to the Department of Defense Wednesday afternoon for comment on this speculation. In response, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Col. David Lapan (USMC) responded with the following statement:
There is no evidence to suggest that this is anything else other than a condensation trail from an aircraft.
As stated yesterday, NORAD and USNORTHCOM determined that there was no threat to the US homeland.
In a follow-up, The Blaze asked whether or not the Department of Defense could either confirm or deny the NGA's account of missile activity in the vicinity of Monday's unexplained occurrence. This request for comment has thus far gone unanswered.
If the object's contrail did come from a commercial jet and not a military operation, the FAA hasn't been able to confirm it. Though Col. Lapan told reporters Wednesday that the FAA had run "radar replays" from Monday afternoon, he said they were unable to identify any "fast-moving unidentified targets" or "unusual sightings from pilots" flying in the area Monday afternoon.
But many people have speculated the object's near-vertical trajectory suggests it was a rocket of some sort rather than a commercial airliner. "We did not approve any commercial space launches in that area for Monday, and any additional information should come from NORAD. That's pretty much all I can say right now," FAA spokesman Ian Gregor told SPACE.com Tuesday.
Though the FAA hasn't confirmed an account of a jetliner leaving the exhaust trail, one blogger thinks he may have pinpointed the culprit. Fox News reports:
On his blog "Time to Think," Liem Bahneman on Wednesday pinpointed America West Flight 808 as the likely cause — backing up an explanation offered by a senior military official to Fox News Channel that the contrail caught on video by a news helicopter "was more likely caused by an airplane than anything else."
Bahneman wonders if he is the first to call it: "I did a lot of extrapolation of what flights could be at the right position (off the coast) at the right altitude (for contrail formation) and came down to two possibilities: UPS Flight 902 (UPS902) or America West Flight 808 (AWE808)."
In the end, the fact that the Pentagon suggests the mysterious contrail was left by a plane but has not confirmed the account has raised questions and left the door open for public speculation. Wednesday afternoon, a professor from MIT told CNN's Josh Levs the UFO was definitely not a plane:
But while speculation is still running wild over Monday's unexplained phenomenon in the skies off California's southern coastline, the Pentagon says this case is closed.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to The Blaze - Stories using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
Deficit Commission Proposal: Reduce Social Security Increases; Maybe Eliminate Mortgage Deduction
WASHINGTON (AP) — Leaders of President Barack Obama's bipartisan deficit commission are proposing to reduce the annual cost-of-living increases in Social Security. It's part of a sweeping proposal to wrestle $1 trillion-plus budget deficits under control.
The proposal would also set a tough target for curbing the growth of Medicare. And it recommends looking at eliminating popular tax breaks, such as mortgage interest deduction.
As proposed, the plan by Chairman Erskine Bowles and former Sen. Alan Simpson doesn't look like it can win support from 14 of the commission's 18 members to force a debate in Congress. Bowles is a Democrat and was former President Bill Clinton's White House chief of staff. Simpson is a Wyoming Republican.
Sent from my iPhone
Need Another Reason to Love Christie? Now He Questions Global Warming Scam
Sent from my iPhone
George Bush Schools Leftist Matt Lauer on Economics (Video)
Former President George W. Bush schooled far left mouthpiece Matt Lauer on basic economics on today's Today show.
NewsBusters reported:
Bush should have reminded him that that unemployment rate is currently holding at 9.6%.
Here's the transcript, via NewsBusters:
GEORGE W. BUSH: Well first of all, you know, it's too bad they call them the Bush tax cuts, they might have a better chance of being extended if they were the Lauer tax cuts.
(Laughter)
LAUER: Probably not gonna happen.
BUSH: Here's, here's the deal. Most new jobs are created by small businesses. Many small businesses pay tax at the individual income tax level because of how the are organized. For example, sub chapter S corporations or limited partnerships. Therefore, if you raise the top rate you're taxing job creators.
LAUER: But we've been living under that system for seven years now and we've seen incredibly slow growth in jobs. So why should we continue down that path?
(Video after the break)
BUSH: I don't accept that premise. For 53 or nearly 53 weeks we had consecutive job growth. The longest period in, one of the longest periods in economic history. You gotta remember, let me put this, put this in perspective. I come to office, there is a dotcom bubble burst. Then 9/11 comes and the country is in severe economic hardship. The tax cuts, in my judgment, stimulated an economic vitality and a lot of jobs were created. Now the question is, how do we create them? And part of the debate is should government try to create the jobs or should the private sector try to create the jobs. My argument is keeping taxes low will encourage the private sector to create jobs.
THE TRUTH – BUSH TAX CUTS GREW THE ECONOMY.
During the Bush years, despite the 2000 Recession, the attacks on 9-11, the stock market scandals, Hurricane Katrina, and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Bush Administration was able to reduce the budget deficit from 412 billion dollars in 2004 to 162 billion dollars in 2007, a sixty percent drop. In 2004 the federal budget deficit was 412 billion dollars. In 2005 it dropped to 318 billion dollars. In 2006 the deficit dipped to 248 billion dollars. And, in 2007 it fell below 200 billion to 162 billion dollars. During the Bush years the average unemployment rate was 5.2 percent, the economy saw the strongest productivity growth in four decades and there was robust GDP growth.
Not only were more jobs lost after the 9-11 attacks in 2001 than in the 2008 market crash, but more jobs were created by President Bush's pro-business policies and tax cuts than by the Obama-Pelosi "spend your way to hell" Keynesian failure.
Sent from my iPhone
Paul Ryan: Federal Spending Up 84% Under Far Left Obama
The Obama-Pelosi-Reid Regime tripled the national deficit in one year.
(The Captain's Comments)
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) says spending has increased 84% under the Obama-Pelosi regime.
The Hill reported:
Republican Rep. Paul Ryan (Wis.), who is set to take over the House Budget Committee next year, said federal spending has increased a whopping 84 percent under President Obama.
The budget for the Environmental Protection Agency has increased by 124 percent under Obama, according to Ryan, who counted stimulus spending in his analysis.
Ryan and other Republicans are calling for a $100 billion cut in non-defense discretionary spending to bring it back to 2008 levels.
"There have been so many massive spending increases, 24 percent in the base budget, 84 percent when you add the stimulus," Ryan said in an interview on Fox News Sunday.
"We have had spending on a gusher. And if borrowing and spending and taxing and spending actually created jobs and produced prosperity, we wouldn't have all this joblessness," he said.
Sent from my iPhone
GOP Leader John Boehner: I’ll Fly Commercial
Speaker Pelosi liked to fly in style. She racked up an expensive booze and food tab on her flights across the country.
The "Pelosi One" seats 200 and can fly nonstop from Washington to San Francisco.
John Boehner told reporters today that unlike Speaker Pelosi he will fly commercial.
The Hill reported:
Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), the presumptive Speaker-elect of the House, will not use a private jet as Speaker for trips back and forth to his home district, he said Wednesday.
"Over the last 20 years, I have flown back and forth to my district on commercial aircraft, and I'm going to continue to do that," Boehner told reporters at a press conference.
The statement signals the first time since 2001 that a House Speaker has traveled commerically between Washington and their home district.
Following the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the Speaker of the House, third in line to the presidency, was assigned a designated Air Force jet to shuttle them back and forth to their home districts on weekends.
Former Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) used the jet, as does Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). In 2007, Pelosi requested, and received, a larger jet than Hastert had used — this one capable of flying between Washington and California without stopping to refuel.
A spokesman for Boehner said the Minority Leader had already spoken to security officials about his desire to travel commercially on the weekends, and that he would still use military transport for certain types of trips, like those to Afghanistan or Iraq.
Sent from my iPhone
Whoa! SEIU Members Are Counting the Ballots in Hotly Contested US House Race
Woah! SEIU members are counting the ballots in the hotly contested representative race in California. The race is still undecided. Currently, Republican David Harmer is trailing his democratic foe by 2,000 votes.
A member of the Tri-Valley Patriots took this photo on November 4 showing SEIU members counting the ballots.
Via the City Square:
The Tri-Valley Patriots added:
The Congressional race for California CD-11 is still undetermined.
TriValleyPatriots.com took the following photo. It is authentic. This person also had a pen next to him. FYI, the SEIU is the top contributor to Democratic campaigns.
Why are SEIU members allowed to work either full time or temporary at county offices which affect the precinct hiring, payroll and eventually counting the votes?
The leftists, liberals won't allow a simple requirement to show ID to vote, but have no problem allowing their most politically active union to count the votes!
Sent from my iPhone
Change! The Number of Federal Workers Earning Over $150,000 Has Doubled Under Obama
Barack Obama is the worst jobs president since the Great Depression and is on his way to becoming the worst jobs president in US History.
(Source: US Misery Index)
The democrats wanted to fundamentally change America. They did.
The US unemployment rate has not fallen below 9.0% for over a year now. This is unprecedented.
But, at least there's one segment that is not hurting.
The number of federal workers making over $150,000 has doubled under Barack Obama.
USA Today reported:
The number of federal workers earning $150,000 or more a year has soared tenfold in the past five years and doubled since President Obama took office, a USA TODAY analysis finds.
The fast-growing pay of federal employees has captured the attention of fiscally conservative Republicans who won control of the U.S. House of Representatives in last week's elections. Already, some lawmakers are planning to use the lame-duck session that starts Monday to challenge the president's plan to give a 1.4% across-the-board pay raise to 2.1 million federal workers.
Sent from my iPhone
Morning Bell: Get to Work Getting Control of Government
Remember when Rep. Phil Hare (D-IL) was asked to identify what part of the Constitution empowers the federal government to force Americans to buy health insurance, and he replied: "I don't worry about the Constitution on this to be honest." Remember when Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA) told his Hayward, Calif., constituents that "The Federal government can, yes, do most anything in this country." And remember when Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), famously said of Obamacare: "We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it."
The progressives that controlled the 111th Congress simply had no respect for the limitations on federal government power that the Founders placed in the U.S. Constitution. That is why 56% of last week's voters told the national exit poll that "government is doing too much." That is why progressives no longer control the House. But there are still progressives in the White House. In just the past year, the federal agencies under President Barack Obama's control have already promulgated 43 new rules which the Obama administration itself estimated will cost the U.S. economy $26.5 billion a year. And President Obama is just getting warmed up. The 2,319 page financial regulation bill requires 243 new formal rule-makings by 11 different federal agencies. The 2,700 page Obamacare bill contains more than 1,000 instances where Congress instructed HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to regulate the health care industry. And the Federal Communications Commission is considering implementing, for the first time in the history of the Internet, "net neutrality" regulations that will undermine investment incentives, thereby robbing the nation of much-needed broadband upgrades.
The federal government is out of control. Congress must immediately reestablish legislative accountability by posting complete legislation, ending earmarks, reviewing all unauthorized programs and respecting constitutional limits on government. Congress must check executive branch overreach with aggressive oversight, roll back recent government interventions, stop unnecessary administrative regulations and sunset new ones, restrict bureaucrats' rulemaking authority and override expansive executive orders. Specifically, Congress must:
- Provide Legislative Text: Each House of Congress must adopt a rule requiring the public posting of the text of each bill and major amendment not less than 72 hours before floor debate on that bill or amendment.
- Stop Earmarks: Congress must permanently end the earmarking process which favors local pork projects over the national interest.
- End Automatic Funding: Any program (other than for physical protection of Americans) that Congress has not reauthorized must be suspended for review. Committees must not be permitted to create new programs with automatic funding or that specify minimum funding levels to circumvent the appropriations process.
- Reassert Constitutional Limits: Rather than deferring to courts, Congress must promptly repeal any unconstitutional legislation enacted by previous Congresses, consider the constitutionality of pending bills and assert constitutional limits on the size and scope of government.
- Stop Unnecessary Regulations: Congress must use the Congressional Review Act to stop new and unnecessary regulations. If the President blocks such action, Congress must use appropriations riders to prohibit agencies from adopting such rules.
Conservatives must pay close attention to what this Congress does and be prepared to hold leaders accountable. That is why The Heritage Foundation has created the Solutions for America: Get to Work checklist. Getting Control of Government is one of the five essential tasks Congress must complete to fulfill its electoral mandate. You can download and print all of the "Get to Work" fact sheets and checklist here.
Quick Hits:
- The conservative tide is rising as Heritage surpasses 700,000 members.
- Government auditors said Tuesday that the advocacy group ACORN should pay back $3.2 million in federal funding.
- The Interior Department inspector general reports that the White House rewrote crucial sections of a report to suggest an independent group of scientists supported President Obama's offshore oil drilling moratorium.
- The number of federal workers earning $150,000 or more a year has doubled since President Obama took office.
- You can listen to Heritage experts James Carafano, Brian Riedl, Curtis Dubay, David Azerrad and Nina Owcharenko discuss Heritage's new "Checklist" for the incoming Congress, here. Subscribe to Heritage podcasts, here.
Sent from my iPhone
Michelle Obama Dons Headscarf For Indonesian Mosque Visit
The leftist media is now heaping praise on Michelle Obama over her choice of headscarves.
Seriously.
The Daily Mail reported:
Though her wide-legged Stephen Burrows trouser suit was simple in cut, Mrs Obama is never one to shy away from vibrant colour, and the edgy chartreuse hue was evidence of that.
She last wore the outfit by the Harlem, New York-based designer back in July.
Taking off their shoes, as another sign of respect in the place of worship, she and her husband strolled along a carpet laid across the sprawling courtyard together.
Oh brother.
Sent from my iPhone
Disgusting… AP Mocks Boehner as a “Weepy Speaker In Waiting”
The state-run media is already attacking Republican John Boehner as a "weepy Speaker in waiting."
Our democrat-media complex is already mocking the next Speaker of the House before he is sworn in.
The AP mocks Boehner's sensitivity.
Got hankies? The next speaker is a weeper.
If soon-to-be-ousted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is known for her steely smile and composure, her replacement, John Boehner, has a reputation for tearing up.
It starts with a quaver in the Ohio Republican's voice. Then there's a pregnant pause as he tries — usually unsuccessfully — to keep his feelings in check. Soon, he's choking out words in a rush of emotion, shaking his head and waving his hands as he tries to pull himself together.
It happened most recently when Boehner took his first turn on stage after Republicans seized control of the House in the midterm elections.
Boehner held it together until he got to the spot in his speech when he spoke of his humble origins as one of 12 children in a working-class family.
Then he started to lose it as he told the election-night rally, "I've spent my whole life chasing the American dream."
Soon he was pursing his lips and pressing a fist to his mouth as he tried to regain his cool while telling the crowd: "I put my — myself through school — working — every rotten job there was — and every night shift job I could find."
Instantly, Twitter was atwitter with speculation about whether the show of emotion by the "weeper of the House" was genuine.
It was vintage Boehner to those who know him.
Margaret Spellings, education secretary under former President George W. Bush, says Boehner used to get weepy at school events when they were pushing the No Child Left Behind education legislation.
"Everybody laughs about how he bursts into tears," Spellings said in an interview earlier this fall. "He'd always get choked up about the kids."
Former Rep. Jim Nussle of Iowa, who entered the House with Boehner in 1990, describes him as "one of the more sensitive people" in Congress.
"It's not unusual for him to be touched by a moment, a speech, a comment, whether it's from a constituent or a fellow member of Congress," Nussle said in a pre-election interview.
Boehner's not always a softy: He's delivered plenty of fiery speeches against President Barack Obama and the Democrats. His "Hell no" tirade against the president's health care overhaul went viral on YouTube.
The speaker-in-waiting was asked at a morning-after news conference why he had cried on election night.
"It gets a little difficult to talk about my background or talk about my family," he said. "And I thought I was going to be in good shape, but not as good as — as it turned out."
…With a weepy speaker-in-waiting, it's clear the country has a come a long way from 1972, when Edmund Muskie's presidential campaign went off the rails after it was reported that he had cried in response to a newspaper attack on his wife.
After having godless Pelosi rule the House for 4 years, it must seem a bit odd to have a genuine patriot takeover the position.
Sent from my iPhone
FL Att Gen-Elect Pam Bondi: MAJORITY OF STATES, At Least 26, Will Join Suit ...
Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:
Florida Attorney General-elect Pam Bondi told Greta tonight that a majority of states are now joining the suit against Obamacare. At least 26 states will sign on to the suit challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare. 28 states may join the suit. Only 43 states elect an attorney general.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Gateway Pundit using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites