HEADLINES

Friday, October 22, 2010

Good Grief… Obama Says He Needs Harry Reid “To Continue Economic Agenda”

Yes, he really said that.

The Obama-Pelosi-Reid Regime tripled the national deficit in one year.

(The Captain's Comments)
They've damaged the economy for years to come.

They doubled the unemployment rate from where it was when they took over Congress.

(Source: US Misery Index)

48 of 50 states have lost jobs since they rammed through their so-callled Trillion dollar stimulus bill passed. The Obama-Pelosi economic plan resulted in a cumulative 7.5 million jobs deficit. In fact, Barack Obama is the worst jobs president since the Great Depression.

Tonight Barack Obama told a Las Vegas audience that he needs Harry Reid to continue his disastrous economic agenda.
And, he was serious.
Bloomberg reported:

President Barack Obama urged Nevadans to re-elect Harry Reid, saying he needs the Senate majority leader to continue work on the policies that brought the U.S. economy out of the worst recession since the Great Depression.

"If I'm going to be able to help middle-class families all across this country live out their dreams, then I want to have a partner in the United States Senate named Harry Reid," Obama told a Las Vegas rally tonight on the third day of a five-state western campaign swing.

Reid is locked in a tight race against Republican Sharron Angle, a Tea Party candidate. The contest illustrates Democrats' difficulties as they seek to retain control of Congress in the Nov. 2 elections. Nevada's jobless rate is 14.4 percent, highest in the U.S., and the home foreclosure rate is five times the national average, according to RealtyTrac Inc. of Irvine, California.

Reid, a four-term senator, got 61 percent of the vote in 2004; this year, the nonpartisan Rothenberg Political Report rates the contest a tossup.








Sent from my iPhone

The October Surprise for Dems? WikiLeaks dumps the largest military data leaks in history(Video)

RWB News: I will not be distracted by some Anti-American crack pot that hates America so much he releases Top Secret information that puts many innocent lives in danger. We as Americans need to worry more about Nov 2nd than 400,000 documents that the Media will pick and choose from. We can only hope this distraction does not make Americans lose focus on the "Change" that is coming Nov 2nd .

The "October Surprise" as my friend Mark Levin called it. The timing of these Leaks is very suspect if you really think about it…..Who knows with all the dirty stunts the Democrats are pulling?  Three weeks before election and the Democrats seem to be in a bad spot when it comes to NOV 2nd.  This will give the Democrats the opening they have been waiting for to dust off their old and worn out "Bush" talking points.  " Bush" "Iraq" "Cheney" "Torture" "Cover Ups" will be talked about more than the horrible economy we have after the Dems played every card they had to fix it. You also will not hear about the job losses, the deficit, the budget, home foreclosures, healthcare and any other "accomplishment" the Dems couldn't get the American people to "understand"…….Mark my word……"But But But Bush" is coming back

ABC News

The whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks today released a trove of classified reports about the war in Iraq that it said documented at least 109,000 deaths in the war, a higher number than the United States previously has acknowledged, as well as what it described as cases of torture and other abuses by Iraqi and coalition forces.

"The reports detail 109,032 deaths in Iraq, comprised of 66,081 'civilians'; 23,984 'enemy' (those labeled as insurgents); 15,196 'host nation' (Iraqi government forces) and 3,771 'friendly' (coalition forces)," WikiLeaks said in a statement regarding the documents' release. "The majority of the deaths (66,000, over 60 percent) of these are civilian deaths. That is 31 civilians dying every day during the six-year period."

When including military deaths of Iraqi security personnel or individuals the United States identified as insurgent targets "almost 50 Iraqis died on average in every single day reported by the logs," according to WikiLeaks.

The U.S. military long has maintained that it does not keep an official death tally, but earlier this month following a Freedom of Information Act request, the Pentagon said some 77,000 Iraqis had been killed from 2004 to 2008.

swenbwr







Sent from my iPhone

Patriot Room Radio #99: Florida Redistricting Fraud; plus, Arkaday from Right Condition

Clyde welcomes Arkaday from Right Condition dot com to discuss the Massachusetts and national elections.  They pass through conditions in the Middle East on their way to an extended discussion of China's intentions and (in)ability to disrupt the EU.  The final segment is a fascinating discussion with Kurt Browning, former Florida Secretary of State and current president of Protect Your Vote.  They discuss the Soros – SEIU – Teachers' unions multi-million dollar campaign to overturn a recent SCOTUS redistricting decision by amending Florida's Constitution with proposed Amendments 5 and 6.

Catch the audio here.








Sent from my iPhone

More Of That Delicious Foreign Money

As noted below, the Democrats' fumfer about outside money is ludicrous on its face, given the help they get from their union allies and the corporate money that helped Obama two years ago. Another avenue of attack is their claim that the GOP is being helped by foreign money, mainly on the theory that outside corporate groups get money from US subsidiaries of foreign companies - but it turns out that 49 of the 59 Democratic Senators have taken PAC money from subsidiaries of foreign companies. Three Senators now up for re-election - Barbara Boxer, Patty Murray and Kirsten Gillibrand - have each accepted over $100,000 from subdiaries of foreign companies. In Illinois, Alexi Giannoulias accused Mark Kirk of "economic treason" over a fundraiser in China…but went and held his own fundraiser in Canada. (And this is on top of the fact that the Obama campaign in 2008 deliberately removed safeguards against accepting donations by credit card from foreign nationals.)

So much for that argument.








Sent from my iPhone

STUNNER. Election Fraud In Colorado by SEIU “sister” group also accused in Arizona(video)

Even More "In Your Face, What can you do about it" corruption from the State Run Media and the "New" Democratic Party . Part II in two days.


RWB News: We reported earlier about Mi Familia Vota, the radical far left group owned by SEIU that turned in 3000 ballots in the final hour in Arizona. At last count 65% of those ballots were  invalid due to the registrant not being a citizen, a wrong/invalid address, or a false signature. Now the same group was just caught with 6000 invalid ballots in Colorado….Another State where the elections are tight.

Obama in 2009 "SEIU Agenda is my Agenda" (Love the Purple SEIU Button on his jacket, Isn't this the guy who had issues wearing the flag pin?)

Click here to view the embedded video.

As Reported by The DenverPost

A federal judge declined to force the secretary of state to reactivate approximately 6,000 new voters whose registrations were canceled under Colorado's 20-day rule.

In a decision issued Monday, Senior U.S. District Judge John L. Kane denied a motion for a preliminary injunction that was requested by several labor and voting-rights groups.

When a new voter registers in Colorado, the secretary of state mails a nonforwardable notice of disposition that the voter's registration has been received. If the notice comes back undeliverable in the mail, then clerks deem the voter's registration inactive within 20 days.

Melody Mirbaba, an assistant attorney general, argued that the 20-day rule is designed to stop voter fraud and duplicate registrations.

James Finberg, an attorney representing voting and labor groups, said voters are harmed because sometimes the voter cards are returned through no fault of their own.

He said some voters have filled out their address incorrectly on forms; clerks sometimes make errors when inputting the new data; and postal workers also make mistakes in delivering the voter cards.

But Mirbaba argued that inactive voters can still show up at the polls and vote on a provisional ballot until their addresses can be verified…

…The motion for the preliminary injunction is one of several federal challenges regarding purged voters filed against the secretary of state by Common Cause of Colorado, Mi Familia Vota Education Fund and the Service Employees International Union.

swenbwr







Sent from my iPhone

Stunner. SEIU Offshoot Mi Familia Vota Caught With 6,000 Bogus Colorado Voter Registrations

Do you remember when Barack Obama said:
"The SEIU Agenda Is My Agenda"?

Now we know why.

The same SEIU offshoot group that is accused of turning in thousands of bogus voter registrations in Arizona has come under fire in Colorado.
Mi Familia Vota is accused of turning in 6,000 bogus voter registrations in Colorado.
The Denver Post reported:

A federal judge declined to force the secretary of state to reactivate approximately 6,000 new voters whose registrations were canceled under Colorado's 20-day rule.

In a decision issued Monday, Senior U.S. District Judge John L. Kane denied a motion for a preliminary injunction that was requested by several labor and voting-rights groups.

When a new voter registers in Colorado, the secretary of state mails a nonforwardable notice of disposition that the voter's registration has been received. If the notice comes back undeliverable in the mail, then clerks deem the voter's registration inactive within 20 days.

Melody Mirbaba, an assistant attorney general, argued that the 20-day rule is designed to stop voter fraud and duplicate registrations.

James Finberg, an attorney representing voting and labor groups, said voters are harmed because sometimes the voter cards are returned through no fault of their own.

He said some voters have filled out their address incorrectly on forms; clerks sometimes make errors when inputting the new data; and postal workers also make mistakes in delivering the voter cards.

But Mirbaba argued that inactive voters can still show up at the polls and vote on a provisional ballot until their addresses can be verified…

…The motion for the preliminary injunction is one of several federal challenges regarding purged voters filed against the secretary of state by Common Cause of Colorado, Mi Familia Vota Education Fund and the Service Employees International Union.

Of course, the fact that a SEIU group is turning in thousands of bogus voter registrations surprises no one.








Sent from my iPhone

Yes, Tamika, Election Laws Do Apply To You, Too

No she can't!
A shocked and horrified Tamika Francis discovers that election laws actually apply to her.

Good grief!  Where's Eric Holder?  This isn't supposed to happen. 
Well, not to Obama supporters anyway.

Via KHOU.Com -

A voter who went to the polls Thursday at an early voting location south of the Texas Medical Center served as this mid-term election's reminder to keep your politically themed clothing at home.

"This is ridiculous," Tamika Francis told 11 News as she stood outside the Fiesta grocery store at Main and Kirby, where she had just been denied the right to vote.

"That's not going to roll with me. Is it going to roll with you?" she asked her mom, who had traveled to the polling location with her.

The problem is that Francis was wearing a 2008 Obama election shirt. It has photos of the first family during the campaign accompanied by the phrase "Our President Obama." The presiding elections judge told her she could not vote, nor could she help her disabled mother vote, until she either turned the shirt inside out or covered it up to hide the message and photos.

"He is not a candidate in the Texas election," Francis said. "So why are you denying me the right to vote?"

Her mother agreed.

"And to say a person cannot vote because they have a T-shirt with the President of the United States on that T-shirt, that is not right," Sandra Lucas Francis said.

"I said let me see in writing where it says I cannot wear this shirt,"
Tamika Francis added.

"It's titled Electioneering Prohibited," said Hector de Leon, spokesman for the Harris County Clerk as he read Texas Election code 85.036. The code, dating back to 1985, stipulates that "during the time of an early voting polling place is open for the conduct of early voting, a person may not electioneer for or against any candidate, measure, or political party in or within 100 feet of an outside door through which a voter may enter the building or structure in which the early voting polling place is located."

Likenesses of President Obama fall within those prohibitions, given that he is the most visible leader of – and one of the most active campaigners for – the Democratic Party.

"When you are actually going into a poll that has his picture on it you're essentially promoting a party," said de Leon.

And this week there have been similar reports from Dallas and Waco, where voters wearing Tea Party shirts or buttons are also being turned away until they remove their party paraphernalia.

Tamika Francis, meanwhile, doesn't yet fully accept the explanation, but said she is sure of one thing.

"I'm not going to give up. I'm going to vote," she said.

Elections organizers said her experience should serve as a reminder to everyone, whichever political party, candidate, or cause they support that any and all political clothing, buttons, or other election-themed clothing must be left at home.

Election laws?  What election laws?

Perhaps Tamika should try donning a beret and swinging a billy club the next time she votes.








Sent from my iPhone

Hit Piece Backfires… Sleazy Carnahan Camp Caught in Web of Lies

Anyone who has worked on a campaign knows that the story the Carnahan camp is feeding the press on their sleazy Ed Martin hit piece cannot be true. Paid political operatives do not disobey the political wishes of their clients. The Missouri Record looks at the facts behind Sleazegate
"Did Russ Carnahan Just Pull a Jeff Smith?"

Please help Ed Martin defeat this career politician by donating to his campaign here.








Sent from my iPhone

Hot Mic Alert: Alan Colmes Caught Contradicting His Own Comments

After vigorously defending Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's self-congratulatory comments about saving the world from a global depression and condemning the "desperate" Republicans, a hot mic caught unsuspecting liberal Fox News pundit Alan Colmes giving his honest opinion about the situation today.

"If I were Reid's press secretary, I would have said more what I said, that he was obviously speaking metaphorically," Colmes can be heard saying. Fox News host Megyn Kelly interrupts Colmes, noting that they're still on-air as the show enters a commercial break:








Sent from my iPhone

October Surprise: Limbaugh Announces ‘Reverse Operation Chaos’



Sent from my iPhone

NY Times Very Excited Over Latest Wikileaks Document Dump

Of course they are. Anything that makes the United States look bad has them soiling their drawers. In fact if you look at their front page and the array of story links and photos, it quite clear they're working closely with these thugs at Wikileaks. How else would they have everything ready to release if it wasn't coordinated?Curiously enough, one article points out how closely the Iranians were







Sent from my iPhone

Video: Elections have consequences

Another great video by Ben Howe over at Red State that was picked up by Ace:







Sent from my iPhone

"Airplane" Producer Apologizes For Past Support of Barbara Boxer, Creates World's Funniest Campaig

Famed filmmaker David Zucker (of Airplane Fame) wrote an apology to Big Hollywood readers for backing Barbara Boxer in past elections for the US Senate. It turns out that the producer of comedy classics gave money to  Boxer during her first campaign for Senate. My first reaction was surely he can't be serious



Zucker was particularly upset at the famous Barbara Boxer "don't call me Ma'am" incident
I remember immediately feeling embarrassed that a member of Congress would treat an officer of the U.S. military like that.  And doubly embarrassed that back in the early 90's I had contributed to Barbara Boxer's campaign.  I was so outraged at the pure arrogance of that moment,  that I sat down to write the spot, highlighting the pure absurdity of our California Senator dressing down a General for calling her "Ma'am."  No Naked Gun or Scary Movie ever had an opportunity as good as that one for pure ridicule.  Never mind that the military are instructed to call their superiors including members of congress 'Sir' or 'Ma'am', including specifically, Members of Congress
 So Zucker went out and created what has to be the funniest Anti-Boxer Anti any politician video I have ever seen.


Call Me Senator from RightChange on Vimeo.

David after that effort...all is forgiven.
Please email me at yidwithlid@aol.com to be put onto my mailing list. Feel free to reproduce any article but please link back to http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com







Sent from my iPhone

Looking over our shoulder to drive libs nuts: Did Obama spend millions to keep Birth Cert secret?

Items are organized chronologically, then in order of discovery . . .
Robert Bauer — Obama's Mouthpiece

Robert Bauer, the chief of the political law group at Perkins Coie, the Seattle law firm hired by the White House to defend Obama in court cases challenging his "natural born" citizenship status in the United States and thus, his eligibility under the U.S. Constitution to be president.

Bauer has done his best to prevent the American public from seeing a wide range of Obama's records that could prove, or disprove, his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office under the Constitution's requirement that the president be a "natural born" citizen.

Documents concerning Obama that the White House has refused to release to the public include his long-form birth certificate and his passport records, as well as other records that may possibly be relevant, such as records regarding Obama's possible adoption by his Indonesian stepfather or college application and tuition financial aid records which would reveal whether Obama was ever registered as a foreign student.

Federal Election Commission records show $1,352,378.95 in payments were made by Obama for America to Perkins Coie while the law firm was representing Obama in various court cases which have sought to obtain Obama's long-form birth certificate to determine if he is a "natural born" citizen under Article Two, Section 1 of the Constitution.

Bauer, a Democratic Party partisan, has a long history of defending Democratic Party presidential hopefuls.

A biography for Bauer posted on the Perkins Coie website indicates he was general counsel to the Democratic National Committee during the presidential campaign of Sen. John Kerry and that he served as counsel to Sen. Tom Daschle, the Democratic leader in the impeachment trial proceedings of President Bill Clinton.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Bauer functioned as an "attack lawyer," threatening with FEC complaints groups wanting to run anti-Obama television ads.

Also during the 2008 presidential campaign, Bauer as counsel for the Obama campaign wrote letters to television station managers and to Department of Justice Assistant Attorney General John Keeney arguing that airing an anti-Obama ad pointing to the known association between Obama and Weather Underground radical Bill Ayers would violate federal election rules.

Also during the 2008 campaign, Bauer intervened on behalf of Obama to block the California-based American Leadership Project from running a television ad campaign over support from unions, including the Service Employees International Union.

Again, Bauer filed a complaint with the FEC alleging that the union-funded television campaign the American Leadership Project planned to run in Indiana against Obama was illegal under federal election laws.

In addition to representing Obama on eligibility cases, Bauer also is hired as legal counsel to represent the president in the criminal probe going on into the activities of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

Last year Bauer was at the center of the controversy over Obama's decision to reverse course on his promise to accept pubic financing for his presidential campaign after a meeting with Sen. John McCain's attorney, Trevor Potter, when Bauer claimed McCain did not want to reach a compromise on the issue.

The McCain campaign sharply criticized Bauer's characterization of the meeting.

It was in June 2007 when Bauer authored a piece in Huffington Post regarding Vice President Dick Cheney's aide, Scooter Libby, arguing that liberals should not oppose a White House pardon because a pardon would draw President George W. Bush directly into the case, with the potential the "presidential fingerprints" could become politically explosive.

Obama Attorney Threatens Sanctions
After the flippant dismissal by U.S. Circuit Court Judge James Robertson of the lawsuit to attempt to determine whether Barack Obama is constitutionally eligible to occupy the Oval Office, D.C. attorney John Hemenway received a letter from a lawyer representing Barack Obama and Joe Biden.  (Hemenway had enjoined the suit launched by Hillary Clinton's ally, Philip Berg, the former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania and attorney Lawrence Joyce of Arizona, in an attempt to force Obama to disclose his birth records, currently being protected against public scrutiny by the Obama legal team at a reported cost of as much as one million dollars.)  The letter, written by Obama attorney Robert F. Bauer, states the following:

"I represent President Barack Obama and Vice President Joseph Biden. I write to request that, in light of the District Court's March 24, 2009 Rule 11 order in Hollister v. Soetoro, No. 08-2254, you withdraw the appeal filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, No. 09-5080.  For the reasons stated in Judge Robertson's order, the suit is frivolous and should not be pursued."

"Should you decline to withdraw this frivolous appeal, please be informed that we intend to pursue sanctions, including costs, expenses, and attorney's fees, pursuant to federal Rule Appellate Procedure 38 and D.C. Circuit Rule 38."

Mr. Hemenway's response to the letter was a promise to "write and protest and attack those against the demand that Obama show proof of his birth, and I will continue to do anything I can think of doing that might perhaps deter or injure those who are opposed to "transparency" and "openness" and honesty in governmental operations — all those good and vague promises that Obama threw out in speeches read from his teleprompter."

There's more here . . .

Barnett v. Obama
Is The Fix In?

In a stunning blow to the impartiality of the American Judicial system, Federal Judge David O. Carter, who is hearing the case Barnett vs. Obama, in the Central District, Southern Division Court at Santa Ana, California, has just hired a lawyer who works for a law firm where Robert F. Bauer, one of Obama's top lawyers is a partner.  And that, just days before the Oct. 5, 2009 hearing on the Motion to Dismiss, in which Judge Carter's demeanor radically changed.

Siddharth Velamoor is the lawyer chosen by Carter to serve as one of his two official clerks, from Oct. 1, 2009, till Sept. 30, 2010.  Velamoor is listed as an associate with Perkins Coie, LLP's office in Seattle, Washington.  It is not clear if he has broken his relations with the firm.

Robert F. Bauer, is a partner of Perkins Coie, LLP's office in Washington, D.C..  His bio at the company identifies him as holding the Chair of the Political Law group at the firm; general counsel to Obama's Campaign for America and general counsel to the Democratic National Committee.

Continue reading here . . .

Bauer is Obama's chief "birther" lawyer.  His job is to keep Obama's personal artifacts hidden from the American People.  He has demonstrated that he will use all available means to do this.

Mr. Bauer's wife is none other than Anita Dunn, Obama's Communication's Director, whose affection for Chairman Mao is documented in the next item.

Siddharth Velamoor was Bauer's subordinate at Perkins Coie.  As Carter's clerk, he will synthesize trial minutia for the judge.  He will be in a position to influence Judge Carter's understanding of the facts — put something favorable in — leave something unfavorable out — little things.

Perkins Coie, you might recall, employs in its Anchorage office attorney Thomas Daniel, who was retained by the Alaska Personnel Board to investigate an ethics complain filed against former Governor Sarah Palin by Kim Chatman.  Daniels, a Democrat who donated to the campaign of John Kerry and is a member of the ACLU, said in his report to the Board that Alaska Fund Trust, the legal defense fund which was very carefully created to pay Palin's legal bills from a string of bogus ethics complaints, was itself a violation of the state's ethics law.

You connect the dots.

Was Judge Carter forced to hire Velamoor?  Was that why Judge Carter's demeanor changed at the Oct. 5th hearing?

Update:  A Wikipedia page has been cited by dozens of bloggers after it listed Siddarth Velamoor as one of the newest law clerks for federal Judge David Carter.

A Wikipedia editor by the name of "Paul Pieniezny" indicated that he believed "dangerous people" may "go nuts" with the information.

He wrote, "I have decided to delete the entire chapter.  There are dangerous people up there, with guns.  We do not want any people threatened or killed.  Please discuss if you think otherwise."

Another editor, "Leuchars," responded, "I don't think deleting easily available information from Wikipedia is a good response to fears that some birther might go nuts.  Some people are already pointing to this deletion as evidence of a conspiracy to cover things up.  No reason to add fuel to the fire."

But "Pieniezny" countered, "They do not need much incitement to go nuts.  And I suppose that since Orly's demand to start discovery got the Bastogne answer from the DOJ, they probably do not like the word 'nuts.'  I do not really understand why clerks' names should be put on the page of a judge who is dealing with a very controversial case (I mean the Maffia [sic] one, not the Orly Taitz case, which is not controversial at all) and of course with the Orly Taitz circus.  Of course, any edit to this page is controversial among birthers, that is the very essence of a conspiracy theory."

Birther Lawyer Is New White House Counsel
Robert Bauer, Obama's "Birther" lawyer, will replace White House counsel Gregory Craig, who took flak for his work on the Guantanamo prison closure.

Politico says that the incoming White House counsel Bob Bauer is widely respected as a skilled and pugnacious lawyer and has the unquestioned trust of Obama's inner circle and a deep knowledge of the ways of Washington.

But the announcement Friday that he will take the place of Greg Craig, which had been rumored for weeks, nonetheless prompted questions about whether his experience as a campaign law expert and partisan warrior is appropriate for a job dealing with some of the most sensitive constitutional and national security issues in government.

Republicans moved quickly to cast Bauer, a veteran Democratic campaign attorney with limited government experience, as "hyperpartisan," with a former White House counsel to President Ronald Reagan calling the pick "troubling."

Government watchdogs, who for years battled Bauer over their efforts to reduce the role of money in politics, winced at the appointment, fearing it would steer Obama further away from as-yet-unfulfilled promises to bolster a campaign finance regime under attack from the right.

Even some Democrats privately questioned whether Bauer's relatively specialized background and confrontational style are well-suited to a post that requires both a familiarity with a wide range of sensitive legal issues — from national security to habeas corpus to military law — and finesse in dealing with stakeholders outside the White House.

Bauer's expertise is almost entirely in political law — including lobbying, campaign finance and ethics — and he is perhaps the leading attorney in that competitive and well-paying field.

A 1976 graduate of the University of Virginia Law School, he built the political law practice at Perkins Coie, a Seattle-based law firm, into a powerhouse, hiring and grooming some of the top lawyers in town.

Today, the firm has a near-stranglehold on some of the biggest Democratic political accounts in town; it represents the party's two congressional committees — the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee — as well as the individual campaigns and political action committees of many Senate Democrats.

And Bauer landed the mother of all accounts — Obama's presidential campaign — even before the campaign officially began, which led to his being appointed this year to the coveted position of lead counsel for the Democratic National Committee, a position that also made him the lawyer for Obama's political network, Organizing for America.

Plus, he represents Obama and his family in personal matters, such as the federal investigation of disgraced former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, but Bauer's number one priority is to keep Obama's bona fides hidden from the American People.

Bauer is married to recently resigned White House Communications Director, Anita Dunn.

Continue reading here . . .

Tells you something about where eligibility issues rank with Obama.

Obama Campaign Disbursements To Perkins-Coie
The following is information was compiled from the official Federal Elections Commission website for disbursements from the Obama campaign to Robert Bauer's law firm of Perkins Coie, which represents Obama in various eligibility suits.  The FEC links follow the entries.

2nd Quarter, 2010, FEC report for Obama for America
Perkins Coie:  $248483.94

http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/501/10930598501/10930598501.pdf#navpanes=0

1st Quarter, 2010

Perkins Coie:  $261,206.69

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2010/Q1/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

October 2009 quarterly:
Perkins Coie:  $314,018.06
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q3/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

July 2009 quarterly:
Perkins Coie:  $270,754.18
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q2/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

April quarterly
Perkins Coie:  $688,316.42
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q1/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.htm

l

Year-End 2008
Perkins Coie:  $173,052.52
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2008/YE/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

Amended post-general election:
Perkins Coie:  $205,323.00
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2008/30G/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

That adds up to:  $2,161,155.11

Click this link to run your own query against the FEC database . . .

Perkins Coie does not appear in the pre-general election filing or a few others checked randomly.  You are free to pursue any further information that is of interest.  But one would assume that the official FEC website to which the Obama and other campaigns must report their financial activity would be taken by even the most skeptical among us as valid documentation of the reported $1.8 or $2.2, or anything in between, figure expended to defend the eligibility suits.

This information is about the legal fees only of that one law firm, not the DOJ attorneys, court time, or other related costs.

Obama Waives Ethics Rules For Counsel
Kenneth P. Vogel says that when Bob Bauer replaced Greg Craig last year as White House counsel, it seemed inevitable that he'd be working on some of the same issues he had in his previous job as Obama's personal and campaign lawyer.  So late Friday afternoon, in recognition of that reality, the White House issued Bauer a waiver to ethics rules established by Obama that prohibit officials in his administration from working on issues affecting their former clients for two years.

Those rules would have prevented Bauer "from performing roles that someone in the Counsel's position ordinarily performs" and, therefore, neither "make sense" nor are they "in the public interest," wrote White House ethics lawyer Norm Eisen in a post on the White House blog.

Eisen, who works under Bauer and wrote the waiver, stressed that it is limited, applying only to Bauer's work at the powerhouse Democratic firm Perkins Coie as a private lawyer for the Obama family, and for the Democratic National Committee.

Bauer also served as the top lawyer for Obama's presidential campaign and his confluence of positions made him a powerful member of Obama's inner circle as well as the most influential Democratic election lawyer in town until he replaced Craig in November.

Perkins Coie — which paid Bauer $959,000 in 2009 and still owes him $216,000 — continues to represent Obama's presidential campaign, as well as the Obama family and the DNC. In the latter two capacities, the firm is involved in helping Obama fill out his personal financial disclosure statement, which is due next week, and in fighting a lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee seeking to overturn laws prohibiting huge "soft money" donations to political parties.

Bauer is expected to advise the White House on those matters, and a White House official pointed out that in both cases Bauer's private work is consistent with Obama's stances in favor of disclosure and reducing the influence of special interest money in politics.

The waiver notes that Bauer is "a leading national authority on campaign finance and related matters and the government will benefit greatly from his expertise," but the White House official said Bauer hadn't advised Obama on campaign finance litigation prior to the waiver.

Obama touted his ethics rules as the toughest ever, but his administration has been criticized by Republicans and independent government watchdog groups for issuing waivers to it.  But there wasn't any immediate criticism Friday evening over the Bauer waiver.

"This is precisely the type of situation in which an ethics waiver is appropriate," said Craig Holman, an ethics and campaign finance lobbyist for the non-profit watchdog group Public Citizen.  "The conflict of interest requirements are intended to prevent business interests from capturing the regulatory agencies that oversee them," said Holman, adding that "is not an issue here, and so a waiver for Bauer is appropriate."

Added Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and an occasional White House critic: "I don't see a problem. Basically, I think the president is entitled to have the counsel he wants."

There is no mention in this article of Bauer's primary role — Robert Bauer is Obama's eligibility lawyer — and, as of May 8, 2010, the Obama Campaign has disbursed$2,161,155.11 to Perkins Coie.  His job is to prevent the American People from seeing this stuff.

–ESAD–








Sent from my iPhone

Side Effects: Obamacare Strengthens Compliance-Based Medicine

Obamacare alters the practice medicine by putting a stronger emphasis on adherence to government-determined measures of quality.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) already offers hospitals financial incentives to report on their compliance with certain measures of care. These are posted on Hospital Compare, a site where, according to Kaiser Health News, "patients can shop around by putting in their zip codes and the website churns out a list of nearby hospitals, with detail on available services, care outcomes, patient satisfaction ratings and more."

These quality indicators include some measures of outcome, but they overwhelmingly focus on measuring processes. A recent study by the University of Michigan looked at whether process measures actually indicate that higher quality of care is being achieved.

They found that they did not. The study looked at the outcomes of 352,052 surgeries at 2,189 hospitals and compared them to adherence to process measures reported by Hospital Compare. According to the authors, they "found little evidence of a consistent relationship between hospital compliance with processes of care and operative mortality rate." Furthermore, they write that "currently available information on the Hospital Compare website will not help patients identify hospitals with better outcomes for high-risk surgery."

What does this mean for Medicare patients under the new law? Obamacare goes a step further than simply requiring hospitals to report on their adherence to measures. Beginning in 2013, hospitals that treat Medicare patients will be reimbursed at different rates based on performance, measured using the same quality indicators on Hospital Compare. In light of studies such as the one highlighted above, this means that the new law will compel physicians to perform processes that do not necessarily benefit patients. Moreover, hospitals risk being compensated less for not adhering to the measures, though they may nevertheless be providing high-quality health care.

Heritage research finds that, under such a system, Americans:

would see population-based study results applied to their individual situations despite their unique health conditions, their personal values, and their doctors' experience. They would find themselves under the care of physicians restricted in their ability to exercise their best medical judgment to tailor care to their patients' specific situations and preferences. These physicians would have more incentive to check the boxes on the automatic protocol lists that generate compensation than they would to act in the best interests of their patients. This would undoubtedly decrease the level of medical innovation and weaken the doctor–patient relationship.

Value-based purchasing in Medicare will alter reimbursement only under Medicare Part A, but from the legislative language, it appears that the way that hospitals treat all patients will be used to determine performance scores. This means that all Americans, not just seniors, will be affected. The negative consequences of compliance-focused medicine are numerous. To read more, click here.








Sent from my iPhone

Houston Democrat Sheila Jackson Lee Electioneering And Harassing Poll Watchers

Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Houston) violated election laws when, on Monday, October 18, she entered into Acres Home Multiservice Community Center, walked to where the voting booths were looking for the poll watchers, greeted voters there, and then found and confronted the poll watchers before being directed to, and then asked by, the presiding judge Bernard Gurski to leave the area.

A source speaking on the condition of anonymity said that she heard people say that Sheila Jackson Lee was in the voting area. The lobby of the building was chaotic because some people were in line to vote and some people were in line for the food bank.

So the source, a poll watcher, went into the room housing the voting booths and there stood Congresswoman Lee shaking hands with voters and greeting others–clearly electioneering. The poll watcher then went to one of the clerks and asked the presiding judge to take care of it.

While this occurred, the poll watcher heard Lee loudly say to the crowd in the voting area,"I've heard a lot of complaints about voter intimidation by poll watchers. I am not going to allow voter intimidation."

The poll watcher started writing the incident down.

Lee then went to the poll watcher and asked,"What's your name? Who do you represent?"

A poll watcher is not allowed to speak in the polling area, so directed Congresswoman Lee to the presiding judge. The poll watcher said that Congresswoman Lee indicated that she wanted names to report to the Department of Justice for voter intimidation.

The presiding judge asked Congresswoman Lee to leave.

It should be noted that Congresswoman Jackson-Lee's office is also located in the building where voting takes place. In fact, she has to walk past those in line to vote every day on the way to her office.

Both the poll watcher and the presiding judge characterized the relationship between them to be pleasant and mutually respectful. Presiding Judge Gurski seemed more confident in the integrity of the election process than did the poll watcher, however.

The poll watcher observed and documented several violations of election code and characterized the problems as "systemic".

This account is backed up by another worker there, an election clerk, who also wished to remain anonymous for fear of retribution. He relayed concern for his safety.

The election clerk described the poll watchers as timid. He said that they stayed out of the way, were quiet and and did not talk to any voters.

He confirms that Congresswoman Lee was, in fact, back near the voting booths and talking to the presiding judge but he did not overhear her conversation but saw her from a distance. He estimated that Sheila Jackson Lee was within 10 feet of the voting machines but was not herself voting. He also witnessed Congresswoman Lee talking to the poll watcher but again, could not hear the contents of the conversation.

The clerk corroborated the poll watcher's report that there were consistent election law violations in the polling places. He cited many examples including:

- One man asked to vote for Obama and the man was directed to vote down the line Democrat.

- Excessive assistance given at the polling booth to those who were physically able and able to read.

- Election clerks asked leading questions on multiple occasions such as, "You want to vote Democrat, right?" while assisting someone at the voting booth rather then instructing a person how to use the machine to decide himself.

The poll watcher relayed an example where a man clearly wanted to vote for one candidate for Governor and that's the only race he wanted to vote. The clerk assisting him kept insisting, "you want to vote Democrat, right?" To which the man would respond with the one candidate he wanted to vote for. His ballot eventually was cast with a straight Democrat ticket filled.

All people involved reported a civil and peaceful voting atmosphere though the poll watcher says various people coming in on the first day asking where and who the poll watchers were. One man came to the polling site and yelled, "Are those the tea baggers we saw on the news?'

As the week has worn on, though, all those interviewed report a calm atmosphere even as some election violations routinely occur.

Earlier in the week, it was reported that El Franco Lee also went to a polling place and harassed poll watchers. A claim he now denies which contradicts other eye-witness reports.

El Franco Lee said to the Houston Chronicle's Chris Moran, "Elections are won and lost on participation. Our best elections are when you have the highest participation."

His statement begs the question over whether the outrage over poll watchers is intended increase voter turnout. Poll watching is a healthy part of the democratic process according to liberal stalwart and former President Jimmy Carter.

"In an ideal circumstance," said the Acres Home clerk, "everyone would want poll watchers there because they legitimize the process."

Calls to Congresswoman Jackson-Lee's office were not returned.








Sent from my iPhone

Rush: REVERSE Operation Chaos

"Reverse operation chaos," enthuses Rush Limbaugh, "even the Clintons are on board!"

If you're a Democrat, Rush Limbaugh wants you to stay home. Or, better yet, he says to vote Republican.

65 seats won't move the Democrats, Rush assures. At 75 seats? Now we're talking, he says.

Rush Limbaugh, the perennial prankster and again, trouble maker for the Democrats hits a raw nerve. He knows that the American public is thinking back to the halcyon days of a Clinton as president and a recalcitrant Republican Congress with fondness.

Only problem? Barack Obama is no Bill Clinton.

He's less fun. He's less flexible. He's less pragmatic. He's more liberal.

The only solution then, is to remind Americans of what they're missing and help engage everyone irritated with Obama to stay home or vote Republican.

Will it work?

Actually, I think this idea is pure genius.

People on the center left feel nothing but impotent rage. They don't like President Obama, but they don't like Republicans. This solution gives them an option. It gives them a good reason to vote Republican or to stay home.

Plus, it's true. I have been saying for a year that Hillary Clinton may be used to playing second fiddle but won't stay second fiddle.

I also predicted that Rahm Emanuel would leave serving the President right about now. Why? He's a Clintonista and would need to be free in order to help Hillary.

So far, things are going exactly as prophesied.

Would Hillary Clinton primary Barack Obama in 2012? Yes.

Would Hillary Clinton win? Yes.

Would Hillary Clinton be tougher for Republicans to beat? Yes again.

Rush's Reverse Operation Chaos is genius.








Sent from my iPhone

The U.S. Takes “New Europe” for Granted at its Own Peril

The nations of "New Europe" have been staunch allies of the United States in the aftermath of 9/11, and have sacrificed resources and soldiers' lives in Iraq and Afghanistan. Again and again, the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) have shown their steadfastness and commitment to the United States. Yet America has not always returned the favor. Crucial ally Poland, as well as several other CEE countries, are still awaiting acceptance to the U.S. Visa Waiver Program. The "Third Site" missile defense installations, eagerly anticipated by Poland and the Czech Republic, were traded away by the Obama Administration to win Russian support on resisting Iran's nuclear advances. CEE citizens have taken note, and public support for the U.S. and its policies has begun to waver. Russia stands poised—with an arsenal of propaganda, economic, and military might—to re-establish influence over the CEE region. The U.S. must not take support from New Europe for granted. The region has not yet been lost to Russian influence—but the U.S. must act now to preserve the crucial relationship with Central and Eastern Europe. Two of The Heritage Foundation's most senior foreign policy analysts explain what the American government can, and should, do.







Sent from my iPhone

Obama Event Shock: Union Fires Stagehand for Wearing ‘U.S.S. George H.W. Bush’ Shirt & Hat

Duane Hammet's son has been serving in the Navy for three years. While at work recently, Hammet was sporting a sweatshirt and hat depicting his son's ship, the USS George H. W. Bush. "Work" for Hammet is as a union stagehand, and while setting up for an Obama rally in L.A. today, his employer didn't take too kindly to the name on his clothes.

According to Hammet, and reported by KTLA-TV in Los Angeles, the union asked him to remove his hat and turn his sweatshirt inside-out so that the name "Bush" would not be visible. When he refused, Hammet says he was fired:








Sent from my iPhone

Information meeting on Agenda 21 – The Unseen Dangers of International Environmentalism (Video)

RWB News: Agenda 21 is a global environmental project that has been causing a stir at the local level all over America.  Texans for Accountable Government & The Foundation for a Free Society will present "Agenda 21 — The Unseen Dangers of International Environmentalism" at 6:00 p.m., October 27, 2010, at the Fiesta Gardens in Austin, Texas.  A live feed of the event will be available here: http://f4fs.org/

Agenda 21 – The Unseen Dangers of International Environmentalism

As posted on YouTube by Texans4AcctGovt

Click here to view the embedded video.

Texans for Accountable Government & The Foundation for a Free Society Present:  "Agenda 21: The Unseen Dangers of International Environmentalism"

THE EVENT IS FREE AND OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AND WILL ALSO BE LIVE STREAMED ON  http://f4fs.org/

Discourse of Sustainable Development, Private Property, & Austin Environmental Politics with Michael Shaw of FreedomAdvocates.org

We all want to protect the environment — but attacking private property and diminishing representative government is not the way to go about it.  If Agenda 21 were to be fully implemented, we would see a dramatic loss in our private property rights, a decline in the standard of living here in America, and further harm done to our environment.  Agenda 21 affects us ALL at every level.  Come learn more and what you can do to fight back!

Where – Fiesta Gardens (2101 Bergman ave. Austin, TX Austin, TX 78702)

When — Wednesday October 27th – Doors open at 6:00 pm for networking and drinks.  Event is from 7:00-9:00 pm with drinks after the lecture until 11:00 pm.

Who — Any Austinite concerned with Austin's environment, private property rights, and representative government.

Co-Sponsored by — Texans United for Reform and Freedom (TURF), Brave New Books, The Republican Liberty Caucus (RLC), and El Concilio, a coalition of East Austin neighborhoods opposed to "smart growth."

swenbwr







Sent from my iPhone

Teleprompter to Make Debut in Indian Parliament When Obama Speaks

A teleprompter will be in use for the first time in the Central Hall of Parliament when US President Barack Obama addresses MPs on November eight.
 
As per the tentative programme being worked out, the address by Obama, who once said that "America has its roots in the India of Mahatma Gandhi", would not be for more than 20 minutes.
 
The president's programme in Parliament House complex itself will be less than an hour long, Parliament sources said today. It is scheduled to start at 5pm.
 
The programme will feature a welcome speech by vice-president Hamid Ansari and a vote of thanks by Lok Sabha speaker Meira Kumar. The US president would also sign the Golden Book, the visitors' diary of Parliament.
 
While US first lady Michelle Obama will be accompanying her husband, there was no confirmation whether secretary of state Hillary Clinton will be part of Obama's entourage, Parliament sources said.
 
Besides the visiting dignitary, those who would be on the dais in the historic Central Hall along with Obama, the Vice President and the Speaker would be Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Michelle will be given a special seat in the front row.
 
Obama will take the help of a teleprompter to deliver his address to the 780-odd members of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, sources said.
 
Parliament authorities said this will be the first time that such a facility will be arranged in the Central Hall.
 
Obama's reliance on the teleprompter is unusual--not only because he is famous for his oratory, but because no other president has used one so consistently and at so many events, large and small.








Sent from my iPhone

Reid: My Ritz Carlton Penthouse Is 'Only on the Second Floor'

Facing a barrage of attacks over his living arrangements, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid insisted Thursday that his condo at Washington's Ritz-Carlton was nothing more than a one-bedroom apartment and that his real home is in a dusty mining town south of Las Vegas.
 
"I live in Searchlight, Nev.," Reid said on MSNBC Thursday. "I have a home in Searchlight, Nev. I stay in Washington, D.C., in a one-bedroom apartment — and my penthouse is on the second floor. How do you like that? Penthouse on the second floor."
 
In the interview, Reid stepped up his attacks on his opponent, Sharron Angle, accusing her of lying about his personal life and record and calling her "embarrassing" to Nevada. Reid defended his record bringing jobs to the state and said it doesn't give voters "comfort or solace" to tell them "but for me, we'd be in a worldwide depression."
 
Angle has increasingly sought to characterize Reid as out of touch by painting him as a rich elitist in Washington while thousands across Nevada are struggling amid the recession. On Thursday, she highlighted his Washington condo and said in an ad that he was "another multimillionaire just trying to make ends meet," sharply questioning how he made his money.








Sent from my iPhone

Settling the Question of a Real Estate Tax in Obamacare

By now, Americans have become well acquainted with the fact that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) will have a multitude of adverse effects. The new law is certain to add to the federal deficit. It increases taxes on all Americans in a number of different ways, encourages employers to dump coverage, and will cause many to lose their current health plan. However, a circulating claim that the PPACA includes a tax on real estate sales has misinformed the American public.

There is not a new specific tax on all real estate transactions in the PPACA. But that's not the end of the story. There is a surtax on real estate transactions that are already taxed under current law. Capital gains in excess of $500,000 from the sale of primary residences already face the capital gains tax. The new tax in the PPACA will raise the rate on these gains.

The Tax Foundation clears the air by explaining how the new tax will work:

The bill would impose essentially a capital gains taxes on some home sales made by a limited number of taxpayers. (The health care law contains a new 3.8 percent tax on "unearned income" for high-income taxpayers. Unearned income includes capital gains.) To be hit by the 3.8 percent capital gains tax, you first have to be a married couple making more than $250,000 in adjusted gross income or $200,000 if you are single. The capital gain on the home sale must also exceed $500,000 if this is a primary home and you are a married couple ($250,000 for singles).

Here's an example of how the tax would work: Say a couple makes $260,000. They purchase a primary residence at $400,000 and sell it for $1,000,000. This would amount to a capital gain from the sale of their home of $600,000. Capital gains tax plus the new Medicare tax would apply to profits over and above the threshold of $500,000. In this case, the couple's capital gain of $600,000 exceeds the threshold by $100,000. The couple would pay the capital gains tax, which rises to 20 percent in 2011 under President Obama's tax hike plan, plus the new 3.8 percent tax for a total tax rate of 23.8 percent on that $100,000. Their tax bill in this scenario is $23,800. The PPACA adds $3,800 to the couple's final tally in this example.

The new Medicare investment tax provides a disincentive for business expansion. The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) reports, "The $250,000/$500,000 thresholds only apply to the sale of a primary residence, so the tax will hit other property sales harder."

NFIB also points out that this tax "marks the first time that non-wage income is designated to fund Medicare." Beyond its marginal effects on real estate sales, the new application of the Medicare tax to investment income will have substantial effects on the economy at large. Analysts in Heritage's Center for Data Analysis write, "Raising the tax burden on investment income further damages the economy and ultimately affects all members of society." Their findings show that this tax will result in lost job opportunities, a reduction in productivity, losses in gross domestic product, and reductions in household income.

So is there a sales tax on real estate included in the health care law? In some cases, yes. But will the same provision that taxes some profits from real estate cause widespread damage to the economy? Absolutely.

This post was co-authored by Derek Pyburn.








Sent from my iPhone

Harry Reid: Dem’s Biggest Mistake Was Not Touting Our Accomplishments

The Obama-Pelosi-Reid Regime tripled the national deficit in one year.

(The Captain's Comments)
They damaged the economy for years to come.

They doubled the unemployment rate from where it was when they took over Congress.

(Source: US Misery Index)

They passed a failed Trillion dollar Stimulus bill and rammed through an unpopular nationalized health care bill. In fact, 48 of 50 states have lost jobs since the So-callled stimulus passed.
But Harry Reid thinks the democrat's biggest failure was not selling their accomplishments.
The Hill reported:

Democrats' biggest mistake has been failing to sell the public on their legislative accomplishments, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Friday.

Reid, who's facing a tough reelection battle 11 days from now, said that Democrats didn't have the time to go out and promote some of their signature achievements, be it the stimulus bill, healthcare reform, Wall Street reform or other legislation that made its way through Congress in the last two years.

"I think the biggest thing we didn't do right was tout what we've done," Reid said Friday during an interview on CNBC. "We really didn't have time to talk about the things that we've accomplished."








Sent from my iPhone

Democrats Get Big Donations From Foreign Companies

http://www.cnbc.com//id/39798587<br><div style="color:rgb(60%,60%,60%)">Sent with <a

Pic of the day: The Obama Card – Don’t leave home without it come January 2011

Obama made the famous claim that the middle class, people who make less than $250,000 a year, will not see a tax increase. We all know this is a lie. New government mandates and Obamacare are expensive and will be costly to everyone. Not one group of people will be exempt from these tax hikes.

But this funny picture of the Obama card, at the link provided, hits the right tone in amplifying one of Obama's promises which he'll most certainly break.








Sent from my iPhone

Bold: Illegals Openly Campaign for Dems in Wash.

SEATTLE (AP) — When Maria Gianni is knocking on voters' doors, she's not bashful about telling people she is in the country illegally. She knows it's a risk to advertise to strangers that she's here illegally — but one worth taking in what she sees as a crucial election.

The 42-year-old is one of dozens of volunteers — many of them illegal immigrants — canvassing neighborhoods in the Seattle area trying to get naturalized citizens to cast a ballot for candidates like Democratic Sen. Patty Murray, who is in a neck-to-neck race with Republican Dino Rossi.

Pramila Jayapal, head of OneAmerica Votes, says the campaign is about empowering immigrants who may not feel like they can contribute to a campaign because they can't vote.

"Immigrants really do matter," Jayapal said. "If we can't vote ourselves, we're gonna knock on doors, or get family members to vote."

So far the illegal immigrants going door-to-door aren't meeting opposition. Craig Keller, an organizer for Respect WA, a group pushing for stricter immigration law in the Washington, said he doesn't mind illegal immigrants volunteering for vote drives, he just wants to make sure mistakes on the voter rolls don't allow them to vote.

"Anybody can go out and wave a sign, but when it comes to who's making the choices, there's no question they need to be citizens," Keller said.

In close elections across the country, the immigrant and minority vote is considered key for candidates, especially Democrats.

Earlier this week in Nevada, a television ad urging Latinos not to vote sparked outcry from Democrats, who called it a dirty trick meant to keep Hispanics home and boost Republican candidates. Univision and Telemundo — the nation's two largest Spanish-language networks — canceled the ad, which the Republican group Latinos for Reform had planned to eventually run in Nevada, Florida, California, Texas and Colorado through the Nov. 2 election.

Seattle is home to a wide array of immigrant communities, from Latinos to east Africans and Asians.

Congress declined this year to consider overhauling the country's immigration law, much to the chagrin of immigrant advocates who had expected Democrats to do so by now.

Still, OneAmerica Votes launched one of the largest get-out-the-vote campaigns in the state on behalf of Democratic candidates. The organization is an offshoot of OneAmerica, one of the state's largest and the most influential immigrant-rights advocacy group.

Through home visits, phone banks and mailings the organization is aiming to reach about 40,000 registered voters in the Seattle area in an attempt to help Democrats gain ground in key races. Volunteers include other types of people who can't vote, such as legal permanent residents.

About 150 volunteers rolled out in nine cities across Washington this past week, knocking on 3,000 doors.

In Bellevue, a city of nearly 123,000 east of Seattle, Gianni knocked on 25 doors and spoke to 15 people, she said.

One man, a naturalized citizen from the Philippines, said he knew what she was going through after she shared she was in the country illegally.

"There's always a risk," Gianni said in Spanish about her legal status. "But if there's a change, I would feel like I contributed, even in a small part, to a change we all need."

Gianni arrived in the United States on a visa 13 years ago looking for work and stayed. For a while her only son lived here, but has since moved back to Mexico.

"In order for there to be a change to our broken immigration system," she said, "I believe one has to fight."








Sent from my iPhone

Heritage Foundation

DrudgeFeed.com - Drudge Report RSS feed

RedState

Right Wing News

RenewAmerica

Hot Air » Top Picks

Conservative Outpost

Conservative Examiner

Michelle Malkin

Big Government

Big Journalism

Big Hollywood

Pajamas Media