HEADLINES

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Obama flailing to save ObamaCare: 30 exemptions granted already

Remember the McDonald's story that hit 6 days ago?  Might have to can their hourly employee health care.  Not even a week later – exemption granted.

Obama is passing out waivers like candy:

To date, the administration has given about 30 insurers, employers and union plans, responsible for covering about one million people, one-year waivers on the new rules that phase out annual limits on coverage for limited-benefit plans, also known as "mini-meds." Applicants said their premiums would increase significantly, in some cases doubling or more.

Even some states are requesting exemptions.

Without the exemptions, the bad news would continue to pile – insurance companies discontinuing coverage, private employers bailing.

Obama is going to do the politically expedient thing.  He will grant virtually any waiver requested, and those waivers will expire in 12 months.  He'll get past this election, and let the health-insurance world fall apart in a non-election year.








Sent from my iPhone

Chicagoland waking up to the fact Obama’s “Hope” and “Change” were all a crock

We made the above video more than two years ago…during February of 2008…while the Democrat primaries were still going on. It was one of the very first things we did as HillBuzz. We drove to the Southside of Chicago.  The 13th District. We toured the neighborhoods Obama represented in the Illinois state senate. We saw [...]







Sent from my iPhone

President Donates $100 Billion to the United Nations

The U. S. State Department yesterday announced that the Obama Administration has agreed to contribute $4 billion to the United Nations Global Fund to fight AIDs, Tuberculosis, and Malaria from 2011 to 2013. The $4 billion represents a 38% increase over the previous U.S. commitment to the fund. United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said that [...]







Sent from my iPhone

Goldman Sachs Says U.S. Economy May Be `Fairly Bad' - Bloomberg

Found this interesting link on the Drudge Report:

Goldman Sachs Says U.S. Economy May Be `Fairly Bad' - Bloomberg

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-06/oldman-sachs-says-u-s-economy-to-be-fairly-bad-recession-is-possible.html

(BN) Food Stamps Went to Record 41.8 Million in July (Update1)

Bloomberg News, sent from my iPhone.

Food Stamps Went to Record 41.8 Million in July

Oct. 5 (Bloomberg) -- The number of Americans receiving food stamps rose to a record 41.8 million in July as the jobless rate hovered near a 27-year high, the government said.

Recipients of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program subsidies for food purchases jumped 18 percent from a year earlier and increased 1.4 percent from June, the U.S. Department of Agriculture said today in a statement on its website. Participation has set records for 20 straight months.

Unemployment in September may have reached 9.7 percent, according to a Bloomberg News survey of analysts in advance of the release of last month's rate on Oct. 8. Unemployment was 9.6 percent in July, near levels last seen in 1983.

An average of 43.3 million people, more than an eighth of the population, will get food stamps each month in the year that began Oct. 1, according to White House estimates.

To contact the reporter on this story: Alan Bjerga in Washington at abjerga@bloomberg.net .

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steve Stroth in Chicago at sstroth@bloomberg.net .

Find out more about Bloomberg for iPhone: http://m.bloomberg.com/iphone/


Sent from my iPhone

(BN) Companies in U.S. Unexpectedly Cut Jobs, ADP Says (Update1)

Bloomberg News, sent from my iPhone.

Companies in U.S. Unexpectedly Cut Jobs, ADP Says

Oct. 6 (Bloomberg) -- Companies in the U.S. unexpectedly cut jobs in September, data from a private report based on payrolls showed today.

Employment decreased by 39,000, the biggest drop since January, after a revised 10,000 rise in August, according to figures from ADP Employer Services. The median estimate of 37 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News called for a 20,000 gain. Forecasts ranged from a decline of 44,000 to a 75,000 increase.

A loss of jobs raises the risk that consumer spending, the largest part of the economy, will retrench and halt the recovery. A Labor Department report in two days will show companies added 75,000 workers last month, economists project.

"It's more evidence of a lousy labor market," said Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist at Maria Fiorini Ramirez Inc. in New York. "Here we are, 18 months into a recovery and we're not doing much on the job front. Until we digest the excesses built up over decades, you're not going to see sustained gains in jobs or the overall economy."

Most stocks dropped and Treasury securities rose as the report raised concern over the outlook for employment. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index fell 0.1 percent to 1,159.97 at the 4 p.m. close in New York. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note, which moves inversely to prices, dropped to 2.39 percent from 2.47 percent late yesterday.

Prior Misses

Over the previous six reports, ADP's initial figures were closest to the Labor Department's first estimate of private payrolls in May, when it overestimated the gain in jobs by 14,000. The estimate was least accurate in April, when it underestimated the employment gain by 199,000.

ADP's initial August estimate showed a 10,000 drop in private employment compared with the government's estimate of a 67,000 increase.

"This is a disappointing result," Joel Prakken, chairman of St. Louis-based Macroeconomic Advisers LLC, which produces the figures with ADP, said of today's figures on a conference call with reporters. "It's going to be a while before employment really perks up."

High unemployment, public debt and fragile banking systems pose risks to global prosperity, according to a report today from the International Monetary Fund, which urged policy makers to take bolder steps to assure a sustained recovery.

The Washington-based fund lowered its forecast for U.S. growth this year and 2011, predicting a "slow" rebound restrained by a lack of consumer spending.

Geithner's Outlook

Countries that rely on exports to help lift their economies must change policies or "global growth will slow and all of us will be worse off," U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said today in advance of this week's meeting in Washington of the IMF, World Bank and Group of 20 nations.

Global exchange-rates are a source of contention heading into the meetings.

"It is very important to see more progress by the major emerging economies to more flexible, more market-oriented exchange-rate systems," Geithner said at the Brookings Institution in Washington. "This is particularly important for those countries whose currencies are significantly undervalued."

Geithner said the "greatest risk to the world economy today is that the largest economies underachieve on growth."

Voter Discontent

The economy is a top issue for voters in the November congressional elections and polls show the public is increasingly skeptical of President Barack Obama's performance. His job approval over a three-day period that ended Oct. 4 was 45 percent, compared with 53 percent at the same time last year, according to a poll from Princeton, New Jersey-based Gallup Inc.

Economists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said the U.S. economy will be "fairly bad" or "very bad" over the next six to nine months.

"We see two main scenarios," analysts led by Jan Hatzius, the New York-based chief U.S. economist at the company, wrote in an e-mail to clients dated yesterday. "A fairly bad one in which the economy grows at a 1 1/2 percent to 2 percent rate through the middle of next year and the unemployment rate rises moderately to 10 percent, and a very bad one in which the economy returns to an outright recession."

Hatzius placed the odds of a renewed recession at 25 percent to 30 percent, up from 15 percent to 20 percent at the start of the year.

The Labor Department's report on Oct. 8 will also show the jobless rate increased to 9.7 percent from 9.6 percent, according to the survey median.

Payroll Forecast

Overall payrolls were probably unchanged in September, reflecting the winding down of cutting federal census workers who participated in the decennial population count, according to the Bloomberg survey median.

Today's ADP report showed payrolls decreased among all companies, small, median and large, which are those employing more 499 workers.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., the New York-based drugmaker, said last month that it will cut 3 percent of its global workforce, about 840 jobs, during the next six months. The company previously announced plans to slash more than $2.5 billion in expenses by 2012, and eliminated 7,000 jobs last year.

The ADP report is based on data from about 340,000 businesses with more than 21 million workers on payrolls.

To contact the reporter on this story: Timothy R. Homan in Washington at thoman1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christopher Wellisz at cwellisz@bloomberg.net

Find out more about Bloomberg for iPhone: http://m.bloomberg.com/iphone/


Sent from my iPhone

“You would think they’d be saying ‘thank you’ … ” [Darleen Click]

Sorry, Barry … but I don't think Americans want to keep saying Thank you, sir, may I have another.

Let's start with taxes. If today's low rates expire at year-end per current law, that would at a stroke reduce after-tax income for every working American, the average reduction being 3.3% according to the Tax Policy Center. Do the math: 94% of income goes to consumption, and consumption is 70% of gross domestic product. All else being equal, if the Bush tax cuts don't get extended, that's a 2.3% hit to 2011 GDP. That means instant double-dip recession, starting at midnight, Dec. 31.








Sent from my iPhone

Answer FAIL: Kansas Democrat Fumbles Health Care Question

Democrat Stephene Moore is facing off against Libertarian Jasmin Talbert and Republican Kevin Yoder to fill Kansas' 3rd Congressional seat, a position Rep. Dennis Moore — Stephene's husband — is stepping down from. While her opponents have both called for the repeal of the Obama administration's new health care overhaul, Stephene Moore, a nurse, supports it and contends that repealing the law will actually add to the federal deficit.

During a debate Wednesday, Moore claimed repealing the health care law would add $1.3 trillion to the deficit, a figure more than double the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office's estimate of $455 billion.

After the debate, the local ABC news affiliate caught up with Moore for an explanation of the discrepancy.

"My head is full of all the things that were just said to me up there. I'm very, very sorry," she said. "If the health care budget is cut — I'm sorry, repealed, the $1.3 billion is going to come back into the budget from all the things that we're seeing as cost savings in that health care budget."








Sent from my iPhone

Krauthammer: Islam Will Not Dominate America, Europe’s a Different Story

Of course Christiane Amanpour would give credence to a radical Muslim like Anjem Choudary and then when he says the Islamic flag will one day fly over the White House, she acts disinterested and passes up a follow up question to such an insane statement.  Why Choudary keeps getting airtime on TV is just beyond me, but Amanpour is a anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian Islamist sympathizer so I'm really not that surprised.
Krauthammer weighed in:








Sent from my iPhone

Investigators Say Obama Administration Blocked Scientists From Disclosing Severity of BP Oil Spill

More Hope and Change…

A government commission reported today that the Obama Administration blocked scientists from disclosing the severity of the BP oil spill.
The AP reported:

The Obama administration blocked efforts by government scientists to tell the public just how bad the Gulf oil spill could become and committed other missteps that raised questions about its competence and candor during the crisis, according to a commission appointed by the president to investigate the disaster.

In documents released Wednesday, the national oil spill commission's staff describes "not an incidental public relations problem" by the White House in the wake of the April 20 accident.

Among other things, the report says, the administration made erroneous early estimates of the spill's size, and President Barack Obama's senior energy adviser went on national TV and mischaracterized a government analysis by saying it showed most of the oil was "gone." The analysis actually said it could still be there.

"By initially underestimating the amount of oil flow and then, at the end of the summer, appearing to underestimate the amount of oil remaining in the Gulf, the federal government created the impression that it was either not fully competent to handle the spill or not fully candid with the American people about the scope of the problem," the report says.

The administration disputed the commission findings, saying senior government officials "were clear with the public what the worst-case flow rate could be."








Sent from my iPhone

Media Matters' New Malicious Lies About Glenn Beck: Accuses Him of Antisemitism

"Rabbi Shimon ben Gamliel said: On three things does the world endure: justice, truth and peace, as the verse states, 'Truth and peace judge in your gates'" (Zechariah 8:16).
People should be very careful using the term Anti-Semite, not because of timidity,  but because if used too much, and for the wrong reason, the charge loses its impact. I feel the same way about calling someone a racist, a Nazi and the terms Holocaust and Apartheid. Those are all horrible terms and the more they are used they become a little less horrible. As a Jew I feel that one thing that Rabbi Shimon ben Gamliel meant by the quote above is that it is my job to defend a non-Jew when he/she is falsely accused of being of Jew-hatred.

When I drifted by Media Matters today (yes its important to see what the other side is doing), I spotted a most disgusting headline.
Beck revives anti-Semitic Soros conspiracy theory

Furthering his long history of smearing George Soros, Glenn Beck advanced former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad's anti-Semitic claim that Soros was "helped trigger the economic meltdown" of Southeast Asian currencies in 1997, which Mahathir had reportedly suggested was part of a Jewish "agenda." In fact, Soros and other hedge funds were found not to be primarily responsible for the currency crisis, and Mahathir later retracted the claim.
Mahathir a serial anti-Semite did sort of make that claim. In an interview with the BBC in October 1997 he said:
    We do not want to say that this is a plot by the Jews, but in reality it is a Jew who triggered the currency plunge, and coincidentally Soros is a Jew. It is also a coincidence that Malaysians are mostly Moslem. Indeed, the Jews are not happy to see Moslems progress. If it were Palestine, the Jews would rob Palestinians. Thus this is what they are doing to our country.

Now watch the Beck video Media Matters says is an Anti-Semitic rant and tell me what word is missing.


If you answered the word Jews you win the prize.  Glenn Beck's speech was all about George Soros destroying currencies after first warning people via a newspaper oped.  The word Jews weren't mentioned, nor was the word Jews even hinted out. And if pinning the title of currency speculation on George Soros makes one an anti-Semite I am going to get a lot of dirty looks when I go to synagogue on Saturday, because I have made similar accusations about Soros that Beck has made.

Here's some of the truth that Media Matters isn't telling you they work for Soros, or at least Soros is a major sugar-daddy of the Organization..  This is how it works, Three different Soros Charitable Foundations, individual members of the Soros family and the Geosor Corporation gives hundreds of millions of dollars money to The Open Society Institute (see page 18 of the Institute's non profit tax return posted here). Open Society give money to the Center for American Progress who gives money to Media Matters.  Another Soros funded group that helps Media Matters is the Democracy Alliance. Also keep in mind that Media Matters is not required to list its donors, this information comes from the tax returns of the foundations that give it money. 

The Media Matters attack on Glenn Beck, is simply a matter of Soros making false charges against Beck to deflect attention away from the currency argument of Mr. Beck

Regarding the charges made by the then Malaysian Prime Minister about the currency speculator, here is something else Media Matters is not telling you.  The two had a major feud going on. As reported by Lee Han Shih the founder, publisher and editor of asia! Magazine
Like a pair of bad tempered boys, Mahathir Mohamad, former Prime Minister of Malaysia, and George Soros, the US billionaire speculator and philanthropist, had been feuding for a decade, using all sorts of platforms including a World Bank meeting for their fight.Then they kissed and made up in December 2006 when Soros took up an invitation by the London School of Economics Society to visit Kuala Lumpur.
After that December meeting, the two reversed all charges they made about each other.

Mahathir as Prime Minister"
  • "Dr. Mahathir is a menace to his own country."- Soros, World Bank Meeting in Hong Kong, September 20, 1997 
  • "I think Mahathir has made a great contribution to Malaysia's material development but like all great men, he has made some great mistakes."- Soros, in an interview, 2006
Soros As Speculator:
  • '"There is definite evidence that we cannot disclose. There is no doubt he did it."- Mahathir, Kuala Lumpur, 1997, on Soros' role in the currency speculation that triggered the Asian Crisis of 1997/98 
  • "Mr Soros said he is not involved. I accept that.- Mahathir, Kuala Lumpur, December 2006  
Mahathir the Jewish Hater:

  • "Soros is part of a worldwide Jewish conspiracy."- Mahathir, Kuala Lumpur, 1997 "Somehow or other, I have been labeled anti-Semitic.
  • I would like to say that I am not anti-Semitic, not anti-Jew."- Mahathir, Kuala Lumpur, December 2006  
  • "I accept that Dr Mahathir is not anti-Semitic."- Soros, Kuala Lumpur, December 2006.
In the interest of full disclosure, I must admit that I am a Beck fan, an extreme subscriber to his radio show and regular viewer of his TV show. On most days for the past 18 months I have had "two doses" of Beck five days a week. Not once, has he ever said anything that could be remotely called Antisemitism. Let me say that again not once has he ever said anything that could be remotely called Antisemitism.  

Media Matters charge of Antisemitism is not only a lie, but it takes an ugly term and cheapens it.  And what makes it worse it breaks Jewish laws against "Loshen Hora" disparaging speech. The harm done by speech is even worse than the harm done by stealing or by cheating someone financially, because amends can be made for monetary harms, but the harm done by speech can never be repaired. 

An old Chasidic tale explains,  A man once went around town telling malicious lies about the rabbi. Eventually he realized the wrong he had done, and began to feel remorse. He went to the rabbi and begged his forgiveness, saying he would do anything he could to make amends. The rabbi told the man, "Take a feather pillow, cut it open, and scatter the feathers to the winds." The man thought this was a strange request, but he did it gladly. When he returned to tell the rabbi that he had done it, the rabbi said, "Now, go and gather the feathers. Because you can no more make amends for the damage your words have done than you can recollect the feathers." 

Media Matters has no right to make malicious charges of Antisemitism against Glenn Beck or anybody else.  Not only do their progressive goals run totally contra to Jewish law, but telling lies about people are not tolerated by the Torah, as it is said
Thou shalt not go up and down as a tale-bearer among thy people (Lev. 19:16)
Please email me at yidwithlid@aol.com to be put onto my mailing list. Feel free to reproduce any article but please link back to http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com







Sent from my iPhone

The "Toxic" Truth About TARP

By Howard Rich

As the infamous Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) winds down this week, Republicans and Democrats in Washington, D.C. are patting themselves on the back for a job well done. Not only are they claiming to have saved the nation from a "Second Great Depression," this so-called economic miracle was apparently purchased at a bargain basement price.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, TARP will cost taxpayers "only" $66 billion. The White House puts the figure even lower — at $50 billion.

Of course these rosy, election-year estimates are based on government liquidating its ownership stake in hundreds of "private" corporations — including a 92 percent stake in the American International Group (AIG) and a 61 percent stake in General Motors (GM).

For taxpayers to recoup their "investment" in AIG, the government will have to sell 1.66 billion shares of common stock at an average price of $29 per share. At GM, the government must sell 304 million shares of common stock at an average price of nearly $134 per share. Hitting these targets would be a daunting task in any economic climate — and may prove insurmountable in our ongoing malaise.

"How does one get $49 billion out of a company that's currently worth $25 billion?" an investment research publication recently asked. "The follow on question is: why would investors buy AIG shares while the government's AIG stock sale could last 18-24 months?"

Short answer? They wouldn't — and likely won't.

Meanwhile GM has dramatically scaled back its initial public offering in recent weeks — a sign that the company will be forced to continue operating under the "Government Motors" banner for the foreseeable future.

But this debate isn't about getting an accurate accounting of the final TARP tab and assessing its risk versus reward — it's about honestly assessing the problems that come with government picking winners and losers in the marketplace in the first place. Even if government's taxpayer-funded investments yielded better than average returns (or huge cash windfalls), that doesn't make them right — nor does it mean taxpayers will ever see one red cent of their money back.

And while TARP has enabled union bosses in Detroit and AIG executives all over the world to make out like bandits (as bureaucrats across the country did in the wake of the "stimulus"), what about the people who were forced to pick up the tab? What about the 15 million Americans who are currently unemployed? Or the millions of American households that have seen their income levels decline in each of the last two years? What about the small business owners whose taxes are about to skyrocket as government begins making interest payments on its massive new debt?

Certainly interest rates are low for the time being, but the threat of rising rates is a ticking time bomb.

In designating the wealthiest Wall Street banks as "too big to fail" Washington told the rest of America that it was "too small to succeed."

Also, there is also considerable debate as to the accuracy of the "doom and gloom" pronouncements that preceded TARP — which would obviously negate much of its supposed efficacy in avoiding a global economic meltdown.

For example, a week before TARP passed Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke appeared before the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress and made an impassioned plea for taxpayer-funded intervention, saying that emergency action was required immediately in order to "address the grave threats to financial stability that we currently face."

At this hearing, Bernanke testified that the commercial paper market was on the verge of shutting down. This sent major shock waves through Congress, as many companies use the sale of this short-term debt to pay their bills and make payroll. A week after Congress passed TARP, however, Bernanke announced the creation of a special commercial paper funding facility — thus arbitrarily alleviating one of the key pressures he had used as leverage to help get the bailout passed.

Perhaps the most effective argument against those who claimed that the sky would fall in October 2008 absent government intervention is the fact that government intervened — and the sky fell anyway. Economists in their taxpayer-funded ivory towers will no doubt continue to do battle over hypothetical contingencies, but that doesn't change the fact that 8 million jobs vanished in just over a year's time — and those jobs aren't coming back anytime soon.

Meanwhile, none of the TARP money that's been repaid to the U.S. government thus far is actually being returned to taxpayers. Nor is it being used to pay down America's ballooning debt. Instead, it's being spent on new bailouts, more borrowing and additional deficit spending.

Also, in confronting the "toxic" realities of TARP it's important to remember that its initial $700 billion outlay represents only a small sliver of the money government has spent, lent, pledged and printed since the recession began in December 2007.

That's a tab taxpayers will still be picking up decades from now.

The author is chairman of Americans for Limited Government.









Sent from my iPhone

HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE: 24% of saving-for-college parents risk their financial future by us



Sent from my iPhone

BP Spill Investigators Say The Obama Administration Was Either Lying or Incompetent

In mid-July,  fifty days after oil began to leak out of the BP Deepwater Horizon drilling platform, President Obama tried to divert weeks of criticism  by speaking  to the American people,  trying to convince the country that he had been doing a great job at managing the disaster:
"... I assembled a team of our nation's best scientists and engineers to tackle this challenge - a team led by Dr. Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and our nation's Secretary of Energy. Scientists at our national labs and experts from academia and other oil companies have also provided ideas and advice."
But today the staff of the special commission investigating the disaster issued four papers that fault the administration's handling of the oil spill.
The Obama administration's response to the BP PLC oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico was affected by "a sense of over optimism" about the disaster that "may have affected the scale and speed with which national resources were brought to bear," the staff of a special commission investigating the disaster found.
The four reports created by the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling,blast the Obama administration for making inaccurate public statements about a report on the fate of oil spilled by a BP well in the Gulf of Mexico.
The commission papers also are critical of the administration for initially underestimating how much petroleum was flowing into the Gulf. Together, the inaccurate statements created the impression the government "was either not fully competent to handle the spill or not fully candid" about the accident.
The paper faults the administration for taking "an overly casual approach" in calculating, during the spill's second week, that between 1,000 and 5,000 barrels of oil were flowing in to the Gulf.
According to the commission those figures were based on a one-page document prepared by a government scientist within six days of the April 20 explosion.
The scientist's estimate was based partly on an imprecise estimate of the speed with which the oil was leaking and didn't account for a leak from a kink in the riser above the rig's blowout preventer, according to the spill commission investigators. 
That estimate was later revised to between between 35,000 and 60,000 barrels a day—Deepwater Horizon rig, according to a commission staff paper.
"Despite the acknowledged inaccuracies of the [government] scientist's estimate and despite the existence of other and potentially better methodologies for visually assessing flow rate…5,000 bbls/day was to remain the government's official flow-rate estimate for a full month until May 27, 2010," the staff paper says.

The paper adds that it is "possible that inaccurate flow-rate figures may have hindered the subsea efforts to stop and to contain the flow of oil at the wellhead."
Also released were released showing that the Administration actually prevented BP's worst case scenario estimates of the oil leak from being shared with the public:
In documents released Wednesday, the national oil spill commission reveals that in late April or early May the White House budget office denied a request from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to make public the worst-case discharge from the blown-out well.

BP estimated the worse scenario to be a leak of 2.5 million gallons per day. The government, meanwhile, was telling the public the well was releasing 210,000 gallons per day - a figure that later grew closer to BP's figure.
The commission also says the administration responded from a political perspective and did not listen to the people working the cleanup and they may have lied about their most recent projections being peer-reviewed.
While Coast Guard personnel told the commission in interviews that they had enough equipment by the end of May, the president announced around that same time that he would triple the federal manpower responding to the spill. The paper calls this "the arguable overreaction to the public perception of a slow response."

The tripling effort resulted in resources being thrown at the problem in an inefficient way. For example, the commission paper says, the National Incident Command staffers thought they needed to buy every skimmer they could find, even though they were hearing that responders had enough skimmers.

The commission staff also takes the administration to task for having characterized a federal report on the fate of oil in the Gulf as having been subjected to "peer review" by independent scientists. In fact, the commission staff paper says, it is unclear whether any independent scientists actually reviewed the paper prior to its release in August.

The paper said that about three-quarters of the oil spilled by the well had broken down or been cleaned up. Those estimates have been challenged as overly rosy by some independent scientists.

While BP's then CEO Tony Haywood testified before Congressman Waxman, the progressive legislator said the common thread behind all of BP's decisions was  they saved BP time and money but raised the risk of catastrophe.
"BP has cut corner after corner to save $1 million here, a few hours or days there, and now the whole Gulf Coast is paying the price," said Waxman.
BP's CEO, Tony Hayward kept answering  over and over that many of those decisions were approved by the the US Minerals Management Service. And indeed they were. Now we find out that the big lies were not made by BP, but it was the administration, who covered up the extent of the disaster. The blame for this falls squarely on the lap of President Obama.
Please email me at yidwithlid@aol.com to be put onto my mailing list. Feel free to reproduce any article but please link back to http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com







Sent from my iPhone

San Francisco Mandates Breakfast Contents

This is the level of totalitarian micromanagement businesses and their customers are already subjected to in the liberal dystopia of San Franfreakshow:

While all of the media buzz about San Francisco's assault on fast food restaurants has been focused on toys found in kids' meals, the Board of Supervisors last week decided to take a shot at regulating "breakfast items" marketed to adults, too.
According to a Sept. 27 amendment to the city's proposed Happy Meal toy ban ordinance, "a new category of items — breakfast items — are required to contain 0.5 cups of fruit. A Meal must now also contain whole grains where bread is part of the offering."
The amendment defines "Whole grains" as "Bread, such as a hamburger bun or other sandwhich, that is part of a Meal must be made with at least 50 percent whole wheat."

Surprisingly, they haven't yet passed a regulation regarding how many times you must chew each mouthful of government-mandated fruit before you can swallow.

nanny state

On a tip from Henry.








Sent from my iPhone

Report: White House blocked official oil spill estimates

IdioBama

Via Reuters Breaking Politics feed:

 

 


(Reuters) - The White House in the spring blocked release of government estimates on the worst-case scenario of the amount of oil that was spewing from BP's well in the Gulf of Mexico, the presidential commission looking into the accident said on Wednesday.

The commission said its staff was told that in late April or early May that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration wanted to make public some of its long-term, worst-case spill models for the Deepwater Horizon accident and requested approval from the White House's Office of Management and Budget to make the information public.

"Staff was told that the Office of Management and Budget denied NOAA's request," the commission said in a draft report on the amount of oil spilled and what happened to it.


This should put an end to the mainstream media meme that BP's "initial estimates" were horribly underestimated.  In fact, as shown in the Timeline, BP never publicly provided an estimate of flow from the busted well.  The first estimates came from the US Coast Guard, and every other official flow estimate given to the media came from either the Coasties or the Flow Rate Technical Group, headed by a US Geological Survey team.

BP would have been crazy to stand behind an official estimate of oil flow, for legal and technical reasons.

But don't hold your breath.  The media bent over backwards to make the Obama White House appear on top of things "from day one."  The White House didn't realize it had a serious problem until nine days after the rig exploded and sank.  Obama didn't appoint an incident commander until 12 days afterwards.  By that time, they were in full damage control mode.

But it wasn't spill damage they were worried about.  It was political damage.

Had the White House not played politics with the numbers, perhaps private, local and state responders could have been more prepared for the onslaught of crude.  How do you fight a fire without knowing how much of the structure is engaged?  Similarly, how do you fight an oil spill without knowing how much of the stuff is coming at you?

Instead of letting the Coasties and NOAA responders be open and honest with the public, the White House instead moved to create even more economic damage by fabricating a justification for the Deepwater Drilling Moratorium.








Sent from my iPhone

National Science Foundation Wastes Our Money on Play Promoting Global Warming Hoax

Because reality is not on their side, global warming hoaxers have been using art instead of science to advance their ideology. Fortunately for them, they have an endless supply of our money to do it with:

The National Science Foundation has awarded a $700,000 grant to the Civilians, a New York theater company, to finance the production of a show about climate change. "The Great Immensity," with a book by Steven Cosson ("This Beautiful City") and music and lyrics by Michael Friedman ("Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson"), tells the story of Polly, a photojournalist who disappears while working in the rain forests of Panama.

Maybe hoaxers should stick to splatter films.

The NSF supposedly spends our money on "science, engineering, and mathematics research and education," not on politically motivated fiction. But then, NASA was supposed to spend our money on the space program, not on sucking up to Muslims.

One of the many drawbacks of allowing Big Government to spend our money for us is that with moonbats in charge, it will inevitably be spent on moonbattery.

the-great-immensity.jpg
An immense waste of time and other people's money.

On a tip from Anonymous Countermoonbat. Hat tip: the Examiner.








Sent from my iPhone

Campbell’s soup Canada goes halal after requests from groups with ties to Hamas and the Muslim Broth

RWBNews:  Pandering to terrorists.  Campbell's Soup?  Are you kidding me!

http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2010/10/06/campbells-goes-halal-with-unindicted-co-conspirator-isna-employees-proselytized/

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/10/m-m-m-m-m-muslim-brotherhood-good.

Boycott Campbells, I say. From the Campbells website:

In the coming months, all our Halal-certified products will have the ISNA logo directly on their labels, so you can easily identify them at your grocery store

Good in the Muslim Brotherhood. Warhol is spinning in his grave.

Campbell's Soup goes halal with approval from Hamas-linked ISNA


ISNA has admitted ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. So why is Campbell's Soup rushing to do its bidding? "M-M-Muslim Brotherhood Good?," from Scaramouche, October 5 (thanks to Kathy Shaidle):

Campbell's Soup Canada is about to go halal.No biggie, right? Wrong. It is doing so under the auspices of the Islamic Society of North America, a Wahhabi-funded racket that is said to have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood….

UPDATE: Boyott Campbells – here. Send it around


swenbwr







Sent from my iPhone

EPA: Regs Would Only Reduce Temps by 0.0015 Degrees While Slowing Business ‘For Years’

The EPA has admitted that tough new greenhouse gas regulations will "slow construction nationwide for years," while only reducing global temperatures by 0.0015 of a degree Celsius, CNSNews.com reports.

CNS cites a GOP minority report, issued last Wednesday, which says a series of proposed and partially implemented new regulations on industrial boilers, greenhouse gas emitters, and ozone levels will put over 800,000 jobs at risk with little environmental benefit.

"The authors cite the EPA's own staff to show that greenhouse gas regulations, which would require major sources of CO2 (carbon dioxide) to obtain permits and limit their output, could seriously harm the economy if implemented," CNS news reports.

Obtaining those permits, the EPA said in a June 3 report referenced by CNS and obtained through the Federal Register, would cause "delays, at the outset, that would be at least a decade or longer, and that would only grow worse over time as each year, the number of new permit applications would exceed permitting authority resources for that year."

The report adds that during that time "tens of thousands of [permit applicants] each year would be prevented from constructing or modifying," and that companies trying to obtain permits would "be forced to abandon altogether plans to construct or modify." The backlog could "slow construction nationwide for years, with all of the adverse effects that this would have on economic development."

CNS explains the reasoning behind the regulation:

All of these complications stem from EPA's desire to regulate mobile sources of greenhouse gases — primarily automobiles. By issuing a finding last spring that carbon dioxide is a danger to public health, the EPA is able to regulate mobile output of the gas; but the ancillary effect is that stationary CO2 emitters — factories, schools, office buildings — are now subject to those Clean Air Act regulations as well.

However, analysis by the EPA puts in question whether the 80,000 jobs that Republicans estimate these regulations could cost are worth it.

According to CNS the EPA writes in rule-making documents from April 2010 that "Based on the reanalysis the results for projected atmospheric CO2 concentrations are estimated to be reduced by an average of 2.9 ppm [parts per million] (previously 3.0 ppm), global mean temperature is estimated to by reduced by 0.006 to 0.0015 ˚C by 2100."

Or, as James Inhofe (R-OK) said on the Senate floor last week, "they would reduce global temperatures by … an amount so small it can't be measured on a ground-based thermometer."

The EPA has created "tailoring" rules that would protect many businesses from having to file for permits. But, CNS reports, Republicans on the Senate EPW committee fear a federal court could strike the tailoring rule, deciding it does not follow explicit guidelines set out for the process of issuing permits for pollutants in the Clean Air Act (CAA).

Should that rule be struck down, the Republicans point to a study by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce which says that the EPA "could be forced to regulate" about 260,000 office buildings, 150,000 warehouses, 92,000 health care facilities, 92,000 health-care facilities, 37,000 churches, and 17,000 farms, among other things.

That could have a crippling affect on businesses and the economy.








Sent from my iPhone

Chávez’s Secret Nuclear Program

Chávez has been developing the program for two years with the collaboration of Iran, a nuclear rogue state.

By Roger Noriega. at The Americano

Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez admitted last week that his government is "carrying out the first studies" of a nuclear program. He attempted to portray it as an innocuous program designed solely for peaceful purposes.

On Sept. 21, I held a briefing for journalists and regional experts where I revealed for the first time information about Chavez's nuclear program and his troubling and substantial collaboration with Iran. This research — conducted during the past 12 months by a team of experts who analyzed sensitive material obtained from sources within the Venezuelan regime — paints a far darker picture of Chavez's intentions.

Chávez has been developing the program for two years with the collaboration of Iran, a nuclear rogue state. In addition to showing the two states' cooperation on nuclear research, these documents suggest that Venezuela is helping Iran obtain uranium and evade international sanctions, all steps that are apparent violations of the U.N. Security Council resolutions meant to forestall Iran's illegal nuclear weapons program.

Chávez's suggestion that he is merely studying the idea of a nuclear energy program is misleading. In fact, in November 2008, Iranian and Venezuelan officials signed a secret "science and technology" agreement formalizing cooperation "in the field of nuclear technology." (The text of the agreement, available in Farsi and Spanish, is available here.) The week after the agreement was signed, Venezuela's Ministry of Energy and Petroleum prepared a presentation for the International Atomic Energy Agency documenting the establishment of a "nuclear power programme" in Venezuela. That presentation, obtained from sources within the Venezuelan government, reveals that an "Atomic Energy Committee" has been managing the nuclear program since 2007.

All countries have the right to a peaceful nuclear energy program under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, of which Venezuela is a signatory. However, Chávez's decision to rely on one of the world's worst proliferators to help develop his country's capabilities in this sensitive technology sets alarm bells ringing. And his recent public declarations understating the nature of his nuclear program raise more questions than they answer.

It's not only Venezuela's cooperation with Iran on its own nuclear program that raises questions — other documents provided by sources within the Venezuelan government reveal a suspicious network of Iranian-run facilities in that South American country that could contravene Security Council sanctions.

For example, a November 2008 contract between a Venezuelan state-run firm, CVG Minerven, and the Iranian government firm Impasco grants the Iranians a "gold mine" concession in the heart of the Roraima basin in the southeastern state of Bolivar, which sits along the Venezuela-Guyana border. Although gold mining in Venezuela goes back decades, the basin is also home to one of the world's largest deposits of uranium, according to a survey by the U308 Corp., a Canadian uranium exploration company.

There is nothing illegal about the commercial mining of uranium — unless it is conducted by Iran. Security Council Resolution 1929, passed this June after an aggressive diplomatic effort by the United States, ordered all governments to prohibit any Iranian involvement in "uranium mining, production or use of nuclear materials and technology." If Iran's Impasco has struck gold in Venezuela, that is nobody's business. If it is mining uranium, that is quite a different matter.

In addition to acquiring a mine strategically located above substantial uranium deposits, Iranian firms have taken over nearby industrial facilities and seem to be using them for purposes other than those publicly stated. For example, a "cement plant" produces little if any cement, a "tractor factory" produces few tractors, and both facilities are well situated for supporting Iran's shadowy activities in an area that is far from everything but uranium.

The "cement plant," in fact, processes ore from the Impasco mine, according to sources familiar with the facility. The facility, located in southern Monagas state, was built in 2007 by Edhasse Sanat, a firm owned by Iran's Ministry of Mines. According to eyewitnesses, the plant has yet to produce a bag of cement but, instead, serves as a conduit for moving ore to a port on the Orinoco River, where it is transferred onto Iranian-flagged vessels on the Atlantic Ocean. Once it reaches the open sea, there is nothing to prevent its delivery to Iran.

The "tractor factory" in the state of Bolivar is a second facility that provides Iran a benign cover for its activities in this remote region. Operated since 2006 by a Venezuela-Iran joint venture, the facility produces few tractors and is housed in a military-style compound protected by Venezuelan National Guard troops, according to two eyewitnesses who have visited and videotaped the facility in recent years.

Deep suspicions about the actual purpose of that facility were raised in December 2008 when Turkish customs authorities intercepted a shipment sent from Iran to the "tractor factory" in Venezuela. According to media reports, 22 cargo containers and crates labeled "tractor parts" were found to contain barrels of nitrate and sulfite chemicals — bomb-making material — as well as components of what Turkish experts described as an "explosives lab." Moreover, this suspicious cargo was being delivered by the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), which was sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury Department in September 2008 for providing logistical services to Iran's Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics.

In addition to providing physical cover for Iranian operations, banks and other purportedly commercial ventures established in Venezuela afford Iran access to the international financial sector in violation of several Security Council resolutions intended to deny funds to the country's illicit nuclear weapons program. Resolution 1803 (2008) warns governments to "exercise vigilance" against Iranian banks, specifically Bank Saderat, "to avoid such activities contributing to the proliferation of sensitive nuclear activities." Documents retrieved from Venezuelan government archives (available in Spanish here) show that by 2007, Iran's Bank Saderat had already incorporated the Banco Internacional de Desarrollo (BID) in Venezuela. All of BID's founding directors are Iranian, and it appears to operate today as a Venezuelan bank that is actually a wholly-owned front for Saderat. Records of Iranian firms operating in Venezuela reflect dollar-denominated transactions carried out by BID in contravention of U.S. law and U.N. resolutions.

The United Nations had good reason to single out Saderat as a possible conduit for funds used to finance terrorism and nuclear proliferation. In 2006, the U.S. Treasury sanctioned Saderat for serving as a conduit for funds to the Lebanese Shiite terrorist group Hezbollah. Only two months ago, the European Union froze BID's assets for its role in supporting Iran's "nuclear or ballistic missile activities." Yet Chávez's government continues to allow BID to move money through Iranian front companies and Venezuelan partners in order to evade international sanctions.

Ignoring what Chávez and his friends are up to right under our noses is no longer an option. If the United States and the United Nations are serious about nonproliferation, they must challenge Venezuela and Iran to come clean and, if necessary, take steps to hold both regimes accountable. Unfortunately, U.S. policymakers continue to shy away from issues that might lead to a confrontation with the irascible Chávez. But Venezuela's willingness to flout international law and abet Iran's activities close to U.S. shores is becoming too flagrant — and ultimately, too dangerous — to ignore.

Roger F. Noriega was ambassador to the Organization of American States from 2001 to 2003 and assistant secretary of State from 2003 to 2005. He is a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and managing director of Vision Americas LLC, which represents U.S. and foreign clients

FULL STORY








Sent from my iPhone

Obama Administration under investigation…again

RWBNews:  Obama has continually referenced Americans For Prosperity. His 9/18 weekly address here:    http://redwhitebluenews.com/?p=1616It was an AFP meeting where the Dems were caught picketing carrying Nazi signs outside depicting Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, etc.  here:   http://redwhitebluenews.com/?p=1353It is the AFP Obama has spoken of in regard to not having to account to who funds them.   It has been referenced that Koch Industries funds AFP.  The Obama Administration is being investigated for allegedly accessing tax records and speaking on Koch Industries tax-status in August.

By Stephen Dinan for the Washington Times  http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/oct/5/obama-use-of-foes-tax-records-reviewed/?page=1

A federal inspector general is looking into whether the Obama administration used confidential taxpayer information in an effort to attack a political opponent, Koch Industries.

The review was revealed Tuesday by Sen. Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, two weeks after he and a handful of other top Senate Republicans called for the Treasury Department's inspector general for tax issues to look into the matter, saying either administration officials had illegal access to taxpayer information or were inappropriately speculating in public about the company's tax status.

Charles and David Koch, brothers who control the Kansas-based company, are libertarians who have used some of their wealth to fund conservative groups and causes that oppose much of PresidentObama's agenda. Mr. Obama has singled out the company for criticism in speeches.

In an Aug. 27 briefing with some reporters on calls to restructure the corporate tax code, an unidentified administration official cited Koch Industries, a major privately held energy company, by name, and then seemed to indicate that the company didn't pay any corporate income tax, according to the Wall Street Journal.

"In this country, we have partnerships, we have [S corporations], we have [limited-liability companies], we have a series of entities that do not pay corporate income tax," said the senior administration official, according to press reports. "Some of which are really giant firms – you know, Koch Industries is a multibillion-dollar business."

The Weekly Standard, which first questioned whether the comments crossed a legal line, has reported that the unidentified administration official "appears to have been" Austan Goolsbee, named last month as chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.

White House official said Tuesday that the administration will not use the Koch example in the future, but that the comment was "not based on any review of tax filings." Other White House officials have told reporters that the information was publicly available, including in testimony to the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board and on Koch's website.

But an attorney for Koch said in a statement last month that the company does pay corporate income taxes and that information about its structure and tax liability are not publicly available.

Mr. Grassley and his fellow Republicans pointed to that statement in their request for an investigation.

"The statement that Koch is a [nontaxable] pass-through entity implies direct knowledge of Koch's legal and tax status, which would appear to be a violation of Section 6103″ of the Internal Revenue Code, the senators wrote. "Alternatively, if the statement was based on speculation, it raises the question of whether the administration speculating about any specific taxpayer's liability is appropriate."

In a reply to Mr. Grassley, Treasury Inspector General J. Russell Georgesaid he will review the chain of events.

"As the inspector general charged with ensuring, among other things, the fair implementation of our nation's system of tax administration, … I have ordered the commencement of a review into the matters alleged," he said.

Still, Mr. George said that, since Republicans are in the minority, there are some constraints on what he'll be able to share with the GOP after the review is completed.

Koch has become a target for Democrats in recent months for funding Americans for Prosperity, a conservative lobbying group, among other conservative and libertarian causes. In an August speech,Mr. Obama said Americans for Prosperity was an example of why the country needs to write new campaign-finance rules.

"They don't have to say who exactly the Americans for Prosperity are," Mr. Obama said. "You don't know if it's a foreign-controlled corporation. You don't know if it's a big oil company or a big bank."




swenbwr







Sent from my iPhone

Bill Clinton Wants to Dedicate Ground Zero Mosque to Muslims Who Died on 9/11

I didn't think my opinion of Bill Clinton could get any lower. I was wrong:

Former President Bill Clinton strongly supports Park51, the mosque and community center planned near Ground Zero, he said in an interview posted on YouTube Sunday.

For Slick Willy, who has received massive amounts of money from Muslims, just building a victory mosque on the ashes of Americans killed by Islam isn't enough.

"Much or even most of the controversy … could have been avoided, and perhaps still can be, if the people who want to build the center were to simply say, 'We are dedicating this center to all the Muslims who were killed on 9/11,'" Clinton said.

You know, like Mohamed Atta.

Somewhere in the world there has got to be a toilet large enough to flush this creep down.

bill clinton
With this face, I could rest my case against Democrats.

On a tip from Ummah Gummah.








Sent from my iPhone

Video of Muslim Cleric: "The Flag of Islam will one day fly over the White House" - Part 2

An update on a recent post: Video of Muslim Cleric: "The Flag of Islam will one day fly over the White House". This video has generated outrage:
Charles Krathammer took on those comments in this Bill O'Reilly segment:







Sent from my iPhone

Video: Art Censored at Penn State for Being Critical of Islamic Terrorism

Let me repeat - the art was not critical of Islam, but of Islamic terrorism. It was banned anyway by taxpayer-funded Penn State University. Which should be a call to all Christians to start beheading people. Or at least slitting a bunch of throats - publicly and on-camera. Because if Christians did that, maybe they wouldn't have to put up with taxpayer-funded art exhibits that show Jesus receiving homosexual oral sex. Or the crucifix in a jar or urine as art, again at taxpayer expense. And we wouldn't have to put up with idiot SCOTUS justices giving special preference just to Muslims in clamping down on the free speech of everyone else. But Christians don't behead people, or force them to become Chritians, and react with tolerance rather than violence, which is why wimpy liberal 'artists' continue to defecate on Christianity but won't touch Islam with a 10-foot paint brush. The only message that they make at this point is that they're a bunch of wimpy douchebags. Penn State art graduate Joshua Stulman is not one of those, and has been censored using our taxpayer dollars as a result:
Stulman learned one lesson from Penn State - if you're going to mock anyone, make sure you mock the Creator of the universe and the Lord of Lords, King of Kings. Mocking fictitious Islamic terrorists on the other hand is off limits. Or so says our liberal ruling class. HT: moonbattery







Sent from my iPhone

As companies threaten to drop health-insurance due to cost, Sebelius gives them a pass to not follow

RWBNews: Written into Obamacare is the little known clause that Sebelius has the discretion to waive the guidelines of Obamacare.  Companies are learning quickly they can circumvent the health-care requirements if they complain about cost, apply for a waiver and change nothing. So, what's the point of Obamacare if waivers are being handed out already?

By Drew Armstrong, Bloomberg News http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/10/06/30_groups_companies_get_health_waivers/

WASHINGTON — The federal government has decided to provide waivers to 30 companies and groups that will allow them to cap insurance costs, leaving almost a million workers exposed to catastrophic costs despite a new protection in the health care law.

The companies and organizations, including McDonald's Corp., will not be required to raise the minimum annual benefit included in low-cost health plans often used to cover part-time or low-wage employees. The Department of Health and Human Services, which provided a list of exemptions, said it granted waivers late last month so workers with such plans would not lose coverage from employers who might choose instead to drop their health insurance altogether.

Without the waivers, companies would have had to provide a minimum of $750,000 in coverage next year, increasing to $1.25 million in 2012, $2 million in 2013, and unlimited coverage in 2014. Several companies had appealed to the department for the waivers.

The United Agricultural Benefit Trust, the California-based cooperative that offers coverage to farm workers, got to exempt 17,347 people. San Diego-based Jack in the Box's waiver is for 1,130 workers, while McDonald's asked to excuse 115,000.

The plans will be exempt from rules intended to keep people from paying for all care once they reach a preset coverage cap. McDonald's, which offers the programs as a way to cover part-time employees, told the Obama administration it may reevaluate the plans unless it got a waiver.

Executives at McDonald's, based in Oak Brook, Ill., and Jack in the Box did not respond to requests for comment.

The new regulations also would have hit some of the insurance plans for young adults in the universal coverage program run by Massachusetts. The program, enacted in 2006, has a plan for individuals age 18 to 26 who cannot get coverage through work, covering about 5,000 people.

The waiver obtained by the state "will give us time to implement the transition plan in a manner designed to mitigate premium increases,'' Dick Powers, a spokesman for the state program, said by phone.

The biggest single waiver, for 351,000 people, was for the United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund, a New York union that provides coverage for city teachers. The union asked for a waiver for its supplemental drug plan, which offers coverage up to $100,000 to pay for prescriptions, said union president Michael Mulgrew. The city covers hospital and physician care for teachers and their families.

The waiver will buy the union time to decide how to comply with the new limit. "We want to look at these costs and figure out exactly what they should cost us,'' he said

swenbwr







Sent from my iPhone

Heritage Foundation

DrudgeFeed.com - Drudge Report RSS feed

RedState

Right Wing News

RenewAmerica

Hot Air » Top Picks

Conservative Outpost

Conservative Examiner

Michelle Malkin

Big Government

Big Journalism

Big Hollywood

Pajamas Media