WikiLeaks: Cables Show Global Growth of U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency

from - Big Government by Publius


WikiLeaks: Cables Show Global Growth of U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency: "

From the New York Times:

Like many of the cables made public in recent weeks, those describing the drug war do not offer large disclosures. Rather, it is the details that add up to a clearer picture of the corrupting influence of big traffickers, the tricky game of figuring out which foreign officials are actually controlled by drug lords, and the story of how an entrepreneurial agency operating in the shadows of the F.B.I. has become something more than a drug agency. The D.E.A. now has 87 offices in 63 countries and close partnerships with governments that keep the Central Intelligence Agency at arm’s length.

Because of the ubiquity of the drug scourge, today’s D.E.A. has access to foreign governments, including those, like Nicaragua’s and Venezuela’s, that have strained diplomatic relations with the United States. Many are eager to take advantage of the agency’s drug detection and wiretapping technologies.

In some countries, the collaboration appears to work well, with the drug agency providing intelligence that has helped bring down traffickers, and even entire cartels. But the victories can come at a high price, according to the cables, which describe scores of D.E.A. informants and a handful of agents who have been killed in Mexico and Afghanistan.

In Venezuela, the local intelligence service turned the tables on the D.E.A., infiltrating its operations, sabotaging equipment and hiring a computer hacker to intercept American Embassy e-mails, the cables report.

And as the drug agency has expanded its eavesdropping operations to keep up with cartels, it has faced repeated pressure to redirect its counternarcotics surveillance to local concerns, provoking tensions with some of Washington’s closest allies.

Read the whole thing here. One of the more insidious aspects of government is its tendency to grow on its own, without any explicit approval or direction from elected officials. A parting question: “Can we stop going to ‘war’ with abstractions?’ The ‘wars’ on poverty, drugs and, even, terror, have all resulted in a dramatic expansion of government and encroachments on our liberty. The ambiguity in the ‘enemy’ rationalizes all sorts of bureaucracy.

"