A baker in Indianapolis may get evicted for refusing to bake cookies for gay events that violate his religious convictions. It's ironic that in nearby Minnesota, Muslims can deny services to whomever they choose without any consequence whatsoever:
How much you wanna bet that if the baker were a Muslim, Indianapolis bureauweenies wouldn't even bat an eye? From One News Now (HT: moonbattery): Bakery displays morals, now faces eviction
How much you wanna bet that if the baker were a Muslim, Indianapolis bureauweenies wouldn't even bat an eye? From One News Now (HT: moonbattery): Bakery displays morals, now faces eviction
Let this be a lesson to all - anyone who doesn't endorse the homosexual lifestyle will not be tolerated. It's not enough for the baker to tolerate the homosexual lifestyle, he must endorse it with his business or the radical leftists will drive him out of business. I want to see the bureaucrat busy-bodies try and force a Muslim baker to conform to the gay agenda. I triple dog dare them!An Indianapolis cookie shop could be evicted from its longtime location for refusing a special order from a college homosexual group.
The bakery "Just Cookies" has operated in a city-owned market for over 20 years. The president of the board that oversees the market told the Indianapolis Star that he would "hate to lose them" as a tenant -- but that could very well happen because owner David Stockton took a moral stand and did not want to endorse homosexual activity.
Controversy arose this week after the owners of the bakery cited moral objections to a special-order request for rainbow-decorated cookies for next week's "National Coming Out Day" observance at a nearby university campus. Stockton told the caller he did not feel comfortable in supporting homosexual values, especially because it would not set a good example for his two daughters.
Micah Clark of the American Family Association of Indiana says there are reports the city might evict Stockton, citing a local "anti-discrimination" statute.
"Indianapolis passed a sexual-orientation city ordinance five years ago," Clark explains. "...We warned [at that time] that this type of thing would happen if they passed an ordinance elevating a sexual behavior to the same moral equivalent of race or skin color."
Sent with MobileRSS for iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
No comments:
Post a Comment