NRC Decision Game Changer for Nuclear Blue Ribbon Commission
By Jack Spencer
The Secretary of Energy's request that the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future not consider Yucca Mountain has been debatable from the beginning. After all, America's electricity ratepayers have already invested over $10 billion into the repository. And besides that, federal statute clearly states that Yucca Mountain will be the nation's repository. Whether or not that is the best policy, it is the law. Ignoring this investment and federal statute seemed like bad policy from the start.
However, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission changed what seemed to be bad policy to definitive bad policy on April 6 when it announced that it will not consider the Department of Energy's motion to withdraw its application to construct Yucca until related lawsuits, which question the legality of DOE's motion, are settled. Given that such lawsuits could take years to resolve, ignoring Yucca in light of this development would undermine the Commission's credibility. The fact is that the Commission could well finish its safety review and be prepared to authorize Yucca's construction by the time the courts finish their business and if the courts decide that DOE's motion is illegal, then any Commission recommendation that ignores Yucca would be moot.
That is not to say that the Commission was not going to consider Yucca anyway. It is made up of inquisitive professionals who clearly want to resolve a decade old problem and it is staffed by extremely intelligent and able individuals. That said, the Secretary's charge to not consider Yucca comes with considerable weight and the Commission surely would prefer to follow his guidance. However, the NRC's decision should provide the Commission with adequate justification to respectfully decline the Secretary's request to ignore Yucca.
>> Click here to read Jack Spencer's full report
Global Warming on the Hill
An Update from Heritage's Senate Relations Deputy Dan Holler
Retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens may have wiped out any momentum advocates of global warming legislation had hoped to generate. Secret negotiations continue between Senators John Kerry (D-MA), Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT), but their plan to advance a cap-and-trade could be sidelined by a tough fight over who will replace Justice Stevens. The trio still hopes to unveil their plan by April 22, but the odds of advancing significant (and devastating) legislation seem to be slipping by the day.
For information on cap and trade, visit Heritage's Rapid Response page, which features research, commentary, blog posts, charts and additional policy resources.
Tap into your network on Facebook and invite your friends and family to join The Heritage Foundation as we educate more Americans about the dangers of a cap-and-trade system that will tax most forms of energy. Get started today at NoEnergyTax.com.
The Heritage Foundation | 214 Massachusetts Ave NE, Washington, DC 20002 | 202.546.4400
You are subscribed to this newsletter as jayman2124@gmail.com.
If you want to receive other Heritage Foundation newsletters or opt out of this newsletter please click here to update your subscription preferences.
Monday, April 12, 2010
Fwd: Energy & Environment Update: NRC Decision Game Changer for Nuclear Blue Ribbon Commission
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment