HEADLINES

Monday, November 15, 2010

theblogprof: Irony: Healthcare reform advocacy group gets exemption from healthcare reform law (ie - ObamaCare)

theblogprof: Irony: Healthcare reform advocacy group gets exemption from healthcare reform law (ie - ObamaCare)

theblogprof: Nanny State: City official calls police on children selling cupcakes without a license

theblogprof: Nanny State: City official calls police on children selling cupcakes without a license

George Soros also profiting off controversial new TSA scanners

George Soros also profiting off controversial new TSA scanners

Coburn promises to attach earmark ban on first bill in lame duck Senate

Coburn promises to attach earmark ban on first bill in lame duck Senate

Nudie-scan CEO an Obama ally

Nudie-scan CEO an Obama ally

Rangel threatens to walk out of his ethics trial, demands lawyer - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room

Rangel threatens to walk out of his ethics trial, demands lawyer - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room

Hamas-linked CAIR: TSA may only search around Muslim women's head, neck

 
 

Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:

 
 

via Jihad Watch by Robert on 11/15/10

There are plenty of reasons to oppose naked body scanners and the recent groping incidents, but this response to them from Hamas-linked CAIR exposes its Islamic supremacist agenda like nothing else does. The scanners, and the whole TSA security apparatus, exists in the first place because of Islamic jihad terrorists, and now CAIR is demanding an exemption from such scanning for the very group from which comes the subgroup that made it necessary. In CAIR's world, the one group that would be subjected to lighter airport security checks than any other group would be...Muslims. And that would in turn make things easier than ever for jihad terrorists. Surely that can't be CAIR's objective, now, can it?

Obviously, as I have pointed out many times, the TSA's security measures will never be adequate to stop the Islamic jihadists. The TSA is always prohibiting or restricting or searching things pertaining to the method of the previous jihad attack attempt -- shoes, liquids, etc. -- but they have no way to anticipate or head off the method of the next attack. And they waste huge amounts of time, money, and resources by pretending that everyone is an equal threat to launch a terror attack -- Baptist grandmothers in wheelchairs just as much as young Pakistani Muslim males. The only answer at this point, and even it is not perfect, would be to institute Israeli-style profiling of air passengers. The Israelis have run an efficient and terror-attack-free air service for years, without all these invasive security measures.

But to emulate them, of course, would mean to recognize in an official way that Muslims are a greater risk to commit terror attacks than Methodists or Mennonites. And in today's politically correct environment, the Obama Administration and the TSA would rather see another jihad mass-murder of American citizens on the scale of 9/11 or worse than do anything to suggest that.

"CAIR: TSA Can Only Pat Down Muslim Women's Head, Neck," by Meredith Jessup for The Blaze, November 12 (thanks to all who sent this in):

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has issued a travel notice to Muslim airline passengers, warning them that new regulations from the Transportation Security Administration violate certain religious rules.

According to CAIR, the TSA's new "enhanced pat down" policy should be limited to searching only around Muslim women's head and neck if they are wearing a hijab and that Muslims objecting to the enhanced full-body scans have the right to request the pat-down procedure be done in a private place.

From CAIR's press release:

Special recommendations for Muslim women who wear hijab:

* If you are selected for secondary screening after you go through the metal detector and it does not go off, and "sss" is not written on your boarding pass, ask the TSA officer if the reason you are being selected is because of your head scarf.
* In this situation, you may be asked to submit to a pat-down or to go through a full body scanner. If you are selected for the scanner, you may ask to go through a pat-down instead.
* Before you are patted down, you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down.
* You may ask to be taken to a private room for the pat-down procedure.
* Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area, and have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.

In February, the Figh [sic] Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.

"It is a violation of clear Islamic teaching that men or women be seen naked by other men and women," the ruling states. "Islam highly emphasizes haya (modesty) and considers it part of the faith. The Qu'ran [sic] has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts."

According to the Detroit Free Press, CAIR endorsed the fatwa.

If any passenger refuses the full-body scan, new regulations call for new, enhanced "head to toe" pat down procedures. "Pat downs are one important tool to help TSA detect hidden and dangerous items such as explosives," a TSA statement issued on Oct. 28 stated. "Passengers should continue to expect an unpredictable mix of security layers that include explosives trace detection, advanced imaging technology, canine teams, among others."...


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Retro Ecomoonbattery

 
 

Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:

 
 

via Moonbattery by Van Helsing on 11/15/10

At least when we look back on the global warming hoax, we can all have a good guffaw at the absurdly overblown proclamations of doom and the willful idiocy of the dupes who believe them. In the meantime, we can look back and laugh at the 70s, when the same sort of people were telling us that only submission to Big Government could save us from an onrushing ice age.

Even then they were hedging their bets, the way they do now by saying "climate change" instead of global warming. Here's a sample from UPI:

"At the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science… the consensus seemed to be that, rather than experience either a warming trend or a cooling trend, we shall have both. Although not at the same time, fortunately."

Incredibly, a generation later people are still taking these clowns seriously.

global-cooling_time-magazine.jpg
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice…

Via The Unbearable Nakedness of CLIMATE CHANGE, on a tip from J.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Pundit Press: Rangel Trial Starts Today with Surprise

Pundit Press: Rangel Trial Starts Today with Surprise: " Longtime Congressman Charlie Rangel is finally on trial in the House of Representatives for various corruption charges. Rangel has been one..."

House and Senate Cloakroom: November 14-20, 2010 | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

House and Senate Cloakroom: November 14-20, 2010 | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

Heritage Foundation

DrudgeFeed.com - Drudge Report RSS feed

RedState

Right Wing News

RenewAmerica

Hot Air » Top Picks

Conservative Outpost

Conservative Examiner

Michelle Malkin

Big Government

Big Journalism

Big Hollywood

Pajamas Media